2012
DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2012.662999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship Between Performances on Neuropsychological Symptom Validity Testing and the MCMI-III in Patients With Fibromyalgia

Abstract: Fibromyalgia is a disorder that frequently presents with both cognitive complaints and psychiatric symptoms. This study investigated the association between Symptom Validity Test (SVT) performance and psychiatric symptoms as measured by the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (MCMI-III), a common measure of psychopathology. A total of 72 fibromyalgia patients at a tertiary care clinic completed the MCMI-III, an embedded cognitive symptom validity test (Reliable Digit Span), and a stand-alone cognitive sym… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The percentage of patients with FM passing PVT ranged from 63% in Johnson-Greene et al 148 and Brooks et al ,147 which included subjects receiving or seeking disability benefits or with possible secondary gains, to up to 100% in Iverson et al ,145 where patients were not involved in disability benefits assessments. In Gervais et al ,146 65% patients with FM who were on or seeking benefits performed in the normal range on PVT, and this percentage increased to 96% among those not seeking or receiving benefits.…”
Section: Results: Evidence For Abnormal Cognition In Fm Cfs and Fndmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The percentage of patients with FM passing PVT ranged from 63% in Johnson-Greene et al 148 and Brooks et al ,147 which included subjects receiving or seeking disability benefits or with possible secondary gains, to up to 100% in Iverson et al ,145 where patients were not involved in disability benefits assessments. In Gervais et al ,146 65% patients with FM who were on or seeking benefits performed in the normal range on PVT, and this percentage increased to 96% among those not seeking or receiving benefits.…”
Section: Results: Evidence For Abnormal Cognition In Fm Cfs and Fndmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these conditions have not been as well studied as others, studies suggest that it is the presence of secondary gain that causes PVT failure in somatoform conditions rather than primary gain. Regarding the role of PVTs, studies on a number of somatoform conditions such as medically unexplained symptoms, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, and functional neurological disorder indicate a relatively low rate of PVT failure unless there is a substantial external incentive such as disability benefits present ( Brooks, Johnson-Greene, Lattie, & Ference, 2012 ; Johnson-Greene, Brooks, & Ference, 2013 ; Kemp et al, 2008 ; Teodoro, Edwards, & Isaacs, 2018 ). In contrast, there is a much higher rate of PVT failure in pain patients incentivized by external gain (e.g., Gervais et al, 2001 ; Greffenstein, Gervais, Baker, Artiola, & Smith, 2013 ).…”
Section: Exclusionary Criteria (Criterion D)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La escala V cuenta con tres índices modificadores que constituyen indicadores fiables en la determinación de la validez de respuesta (Bagby, Gillis, Toner, y Goldberg, 1991;Brooks y Johnson-Greene, 2012). …”
Section: Instrumentosunclassified
“…La magnitud del impacto psicológico, social y económico de la simulación de psicopatología en el contexto médico-legal, y, en el área de la IT, con tasas de prevalencia estimadas de alrededor del 30% (Brooks et al, 2012;Greve et al, 2009;Mittenberg et al, 2002), exige la investigación de este comportamiento para su estudio y diseño de posibles medidas y, protocolos estandarizados de detección, con el objetivo de incrementar la calidad, la fiabilidad y gestión eficaz de la valoración de la IT por causa de salud mental (Martin-Fumadó, Martí Amengual, Puig Bausili, y ArimanyManso, 2014). Todo ello, con el objetivo último de dispensar una más adecuada atención socio-sanitaria tanto a los pacientes genuinos, como al propio simulador evitando que se convierta en un enfermo real a través de procesos de introyección.…”
Section: Discusión Generalunclassified