2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between percentage of singletons and sampling effort: A new approach to reduce the bias of richness estimates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
31
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…None of the rarefaction curves reached the full asymptote (Figure 4), which highlights the need for more studies and new data analysis methods, as seen in the study by Lopez et al (2012), because of the high likelihood that new species may be recorded in the area studied. It is necessary to invest greater efforts in unsampled environments such as waterlogged fields and rock fields at the top of the São José mountains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the rarefaction curves reached the full asymptote (Figure 4), which highlights the need for more studies and new data analysis methods, as seen in the study by Lopez et al (2012), because of the high likelihood that new species may be recorded in the area studied. It is necessary to invest greater efforts in unsampled environments such as waterlogged fields and rock fields at the top of the São José mountains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the quality of sampling effort we constructed rarefaction curves for lizards, amphibians and all herpetofauna combined, based on individuals (Gotelli and Colwell 2001), using Chao2P species estimator (Lopez et al 2012), in EstimateS 8.2.0 (Collwell 2005) and R (R Development Core Team 2009). The curves were obtained through 1,000 resampling of original data, with no reposition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High singleton frequencies indicate that species richness is underestimated, likely as a result of under-sampling [24]. Lopez et al [23] Diversity 2017, 9, 5 5 of 17…”
Section: Multi-river Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean percentage of singletons was 24.5% (range: 0 to 60) and the mean number of individuals per species was 9.4 (range: 1.8 to 24.1). Based on the singleton threshold of Lopez et al [23], 70% of samples provided reliable estimates of species richness, but none of the samples met the sampling intensity threshold.…”
Section: Multi-river Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation