2018
DOI: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2017-0031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship between Neurite Density Measured with Confocal Microscopy in a Cleared Mouse Brain and Metrics Obtained from Diffusion Tensor and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging

Abstract: Purpose:Diffusional kurtosis imaging (DKI) enables sensitive measurement of tissue microstructure by quantifying the non-Gaussian diffusion of water. Although DKI is widely applied in many situations, histological correlation with DKI analysis is lacking. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between DKI metrics and neurite density measured using confocal microscopy of a cleared mouse brain.Methods:One thy-1 yellow fluorescent protein 16 mouse was deeply anesthetized and perfusion fixatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are however evidence that gives us reason to believe that DKI is more sensitive to changes in areas of more complex tissue microstructure compared with DTI. Studies supporting this view have demonstrated that MK and RK strongly correlated with neurite density in the caudate putamen in mice, while FA was only found to correlate moderately, indicating that DKI is more sensitive to changes in areas of complex WM microstructure such as areas with crossing fibers (Irie et al, ). Other studies have shown that MK could reflect neuronal shrinkage (Wu & Cheung, ), changes in axonal and myelin density (Fieremans, Jensen, & Helpern, ) and astrogliosis (Zhuo et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There are however evidence that gives us reason to believe that DKI is more sensitive to changes in areas of more complex tissue microstructure compared with DTI. Studies supporting this view have demonstrated that MK and RK strongly correlated with neurite density in the caudate putamen in mice, while FA was only found to correlate moderately, indicating that DKI is more sensitive to changes in areas of complex WM microstructure such as areas with crossing fibers (Irie et al, ). Other studies have shown that MK could reflect neuronal shrinkage (Wu & Cheung, ), changes in axonal and myelin density (Fieremans, Jensen, & Helpern, ) and astrogliosis (Zhuo et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The diffusion‐tensor‐based parameter FA was shown to be highly correlated and validated with histology‐based FA ST with 2D and 3D microscopy data . Similar to the FA, kurtosis metrics are not a priori specific to any tissue microstructure component, and therefore the histological underpinning of these metrics cannot be established, although a correlation between kurtosis and ν has been reported …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…58 Similar to the FA, kurtosis metrics are not a priori specific to any tissue microstructure component, and therefore the histological underpinning of these metrics cannot be established, although a correlation between kurtosis and ν has been reported. 59 By combining dMRI and immunohistochemistry data we obtain complementary information towards a better understanding of the microstructural recovery from CMS at eight weeks after exposure. The marked axo-dendritic (H ν ) atrophy in the AM, dHP, and vHP regions may be indicative of hypo-responsivity of the region even after eight weeks of spontaneous recovery.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hypothesis-guided approach is performed when using ROIs that are placed in defined anatomical regions and comparing the average DTI metrics values, that is, rotational invariant parameters of the diffusion tensor, within the respective ROI for the cohorts (e.g., Harsan et al, 2010 ; Müller et al, 2019 ) for quantitative comparisons of in-between ROIs or to show differences between various white matter regions. ROI analysis could be extensively performed by placing an arbitrary number of ROIs (e.g., Irie et al, 2018 ) with variable extension. The advantage of ROI analysis is that (in case of accurate anatomical placement) it can also be performed without any prior stereotaxical normalization; in this case, manual ROI identification can be supported by confocal microscopic image (Irie et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ROI analysis could be extensively performed by placing an arbitrary number of ROIs (e.g., Irie et al, 2018 ) with variable extension. The advantage of ROI analysis is that (in case of accurate anatomical placement) it can also be performed without any prior stereotaxical normalization; in this case, manual ROI identification can be supported by confocal microscopic image (Irie et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%