2022
DOI: 10.2478/plc-2022-0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between narrative microstructure and macrostructure: Differences between six- and eight-year-olds

Abstract: The current study aimed to investigate age-related differences in narrative abilities at the macrostructural and microstructural levels and to examine which microstructural aspects explain narrative macrostructure at ages six and eight. Oral narratives were elicited from 89 Croatian monolingual children using the Multilingual Assessment Instrument for Narratives (MAIN). At the microstructural level, the measure of lexical diversity D, clausal density, and mean length of clause were assessed. Macrostructure was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(137 reference statements)
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were reported in former research using narratives elicited from LITMUS-MAIN in other languages (e.g. Altman et al, 2016; Košutar et al, 2022; Lindgren, 2019). The very poor macrostructure skills observed in our sample might reflect children’s poor experience with storytelling and with informal literacy in general.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Similar results were reported in former research using narratives elicited from LITMUS-MAIN in other languages (e.g. Altman et al, 2016; Košutar et al, 2022; Lindgren, 2019). The very poor macrostructure skills observed in our sample might reflect children’s poor experience with storytelling and with informal literacy in general.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Studies including older children show more mixed results. For example, in a study of Croatian-speaking monolinguals (N=89), Košutar et al (2022) found a significant difference between ages 6 and 8, whereas Gagarina (2016), in a study of Russian-German bilinguals found no significant difference between children in Grade 1 (aged 6;5-7;5) and Grade 3 (aged 7;11-10;6). Similarly, Fiani et al (2022) found no significant difference between Lebanese Arabic-French bilinguals aged 6-7 and 8-9, and Yang et al (2023), in their study of Kam-Mandarin Chinese bilinguals aged 5 to 9 (N=55), found no effect of age.…”
Section: Age Effects and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The majority of the studies using MAIN have focused on age 4 to 7, i.e., children attending preschool and/or the first grades of primary school, depending on the school system of the country (e.g., Altman et al, 2016;Boerma et al, 2016;Bohnacker et al, 2020;Bohnacker & Lindgren, 2021;Fichman et al, 2022;Haddad, 2022;Kapalková et al, 2016;Kunnari et al, 2016;Lindgren, 2018;Öztekin, 2019;Peristeri et al, 2020;Roch et al, 2016;Wehmeier, 2020), with fewer studies including children aged 8 or above (e.g., Fiani et al, 2020Fiani et al, , 2022Gagarina, 2016;Košutar et al, 2022;Lindgren, 2022;Peristeri et al, 2020;Tribushinina et al, 2022;Tsimpli et al, 2016;Yang et al, 2023). Relatively many previous studies using MAIN analysed data from participants of different ages without including age as a variable in the study (e.g., Altman et al, 2016;Blom & Boerma, 2020;Boerma et al, 2016;Fichman et al, 2022;Kunnari & Välimaa, 2020).…”
Section: Age Effects and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a smaller number of studies using MAIN included 8year-olds or older children and their results are more mixed, both for story comprehension and story structure (e.g., Gagarina, 2016;Fiani et al, 2020Fiani et al, , 2022Košutar et al, 2022;Lindgren, 2022;Tribushinina et al, 2022). Most relevant here are studies investigating children aged 6 to 8, the age groups included in the present study.…”
Section: Age E Ectsmentioning
confidence: 98%