The relationship between narcissism, managerial overconfidence and comparability of financial statements of listed companies

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the impact of managerial narcissism and overconfidence on financial statements’ comparability. In other words, this paper seeks to answer the question of whether the personality characteristics of managers may affect the level of financial statements’ quality of commercial entities or not. Design/methodology/approach The research hypotheses are tested using a sample of 896 observations taken from the Tehran Stock Exchange and 245 observations from the Iraqi Stock Exchange during 2012 and 2018 using the multiple regression model based on the combined data technique. Findings The findings show that managerial narcissism is positively and significantly associated with Iran’s financial statement comparability. In contrast, Iraqi data articulate a negative association between these two variables. This paper finds that Chief Executive Officer overconfidence and financial statements’ comparability are negatively related in both countries. Following the market variation, the different findings suggest that institutional settings such as the general managerial style, adopting international accounting standards (now IFRS) leading to the extent of auditing market globally in Iraq and suffering from international sanctions in Iran, the governing business environment may play an allocative role in preparing financial statements. Originality/value The present research is the first research conducted in two emerging markets (Iran and Iraq) examining the relationship between managers’ narcissism and overconfidence and financial statements’ comparability. Therefore, the present research in this area can significantly contribute to the development of science and knowledge.

The impact of corporate environmental disclosure practices and board attributes on sustainability: Empirical evidence from Asia and Europe

“…Secondly, the study introduces an empirical evidence on the factors that affect the level of environmental and ESGR. The study comprehensively evaluates the environmental pillar components by considering both the specific ED and overall ESG score [ 1 , 2 , 7 , 9 , 10 , [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] ]. Thirdly, the study assesses the effect of various board attributes and firms' specifics on the level of environmental and ESGR.…”

Looking at the darker side of the mirror: the impact of CEO's narcissism on corporate social irresponsibility

“…In contrast to researchers who highlighted the bright side of narcissism, in this study, we contribute to research on CEO narcissism by analyzing its darker side in explaining CSI which, to date, has only scarcely being examined. For example, Almaleki et al (2021) found support for the negative impact of CEO narcissism on the quality of financial statements in a sample of 128 Iran firms from 2012 to 2018. They argue that narcissistic CEOs are likely to deliberately distort information, leading to a lack of disclosure of bad news to stakeholders and manipulating them for achieving support, i.e.…”

Multivariate Analysis for Overcoming Complexities of Corporate Governance and Managerial Dilemma Using Data Mining Techniques

“…ey used panel data regression to test the hypothesis. Almaleki et al [29] aimed to investigate the comparability between the impact of managerial pride and overconfidence on financial statements. Velte [30] showed the link between corporate governance and corporate financial misconduct.…”