2018
DOI: 10.1177/0003489418778302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship Between Modified Mallampati Score, Müller’s Maneuver and Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy Regarding Retrolingual Obstruction

Abstract: A significant discrepancy existed between retrolingual airway collapse evaluated by modified Mallampati score and Müller's maneuver. Modified Mallampati score is more correlated with DISE regarding retrolingual obstruction compared to Müller's maneuver. It should therefore be used as an initial evaluation of retrolingual obstruction when DISE is unavailable.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
14
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…42 However, there was no statistically significant difference in this study, in which a complete tongue base collapse was identified in 30.6% of individuals with FTP grades III and IV, while Wang et al found an incidence of 32% in individuals with MMC classes III and IV. 42 In addition, we found no association between retroglossal collapse and tongue position on DISE, similar to the findings of den Herder et al 43 Tongue base collapse has a more complex pathogenesis, related not only to tongue position and/or volume but also to muscle tone during sleep. 44,45 There were some limitations to this study to consider.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…42 However, there was no statistically significant difference in this study, in which a complete tongue base collapse was identified in 30.6% of individuals with FTP grades III and IV, while Wang et al found an incidence of 32% in individuals with MMC classes III and IV. 42 In addition, we found no association between retroglossal collapse and tongue position on DISE, similar to the findings of den Herder et al 43 Tongue base collapse has a more complex pathogenesis, related not only to tongue position and/or volume but also to muscle tone during sleep. 44,45 There were some limitations to this study to consider.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Because MMS was used to score a large tongue size, and DISE was used to assess obstruction at tongue base level, both assessments were recorded differently. However, Wang et al showed a significant correlation between MMS and DISE in the evaluation of tongue base collapse [ 15 ]. The different view was that retrolingual obstruction occurred due to muscular hypotonia, resulting in upper airway collapse during sleep.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An Olympus 3.2 mm fibro-optic scope passed through the nose to survey velum, oropharynx, and tongue base; epiglottis was used for evaluation. Every patient received level dimensional change by inhaling with a blocked nose to cause negative pressure and the collapse percentage of the airway in the velum, oropharynx, and tongue base areas; the epiglottic area was assessed and graded under Wang’s grading system [ 15 ]. The collapsibility and dimensional change were recorded as follows: retropalatal anterior and posterior (A–P) collapse grade 0–2; retropalatal lateral collapse grade 0–2; retropalatal circumferential collapse grade 0–2; retroglossal A–P collapse grade 0–2; retoglossal lateral-to-lateral (L–L) collapse grade 0–2; and retroglossal circumferential collapse grade 0–2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, it has been proposed that a simple anatomical assessment in the Mallampati Score may be a reflection of anatomical balance [ 99 ] and this has been explored as a simple anatomical phenotype of OA m response. Mallampati score may also be an indicator of the site of pharyngeal collapse, particularly retrolingual collapse [ 100 ]. A simplified method of quantitative assessment of facial phenotype from photographs has been developed in OSA patients which reflects OSA risk [ 101 – 103 ].…”
Section: Personalisation Strategies and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%