1993
DOI: 10.1002/j.1873-5924.1993.tb00565.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship Between Market and Accounting Betas for Commercial Banks

Abstract: This study examines the correlation between market equity betas and accounting asset and equity betas in the commercial banking sector. A sample of banks was taken from the COMPUSTAT tapes and annual equity and asset accounting betas (calculated with various indices) were estimated over varying time periods. Cross-sectional correlations were then determined for individual banks and five-bank portfolios. The results indicate that the correlations are comparable to those found in other non-banking studies ofacco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Beaver and Manegold (1975), and Ismail and Kim (1989) confirm prior findings about the significant relationship between market betas and earnings betas, using a variety of accounting return variables. Karels and Sackley (1993) find a similar relationship in the U.S. banking industry. Baginski and Wahlen (2003) show that accounting betas are significantly related to the priced risk premiums in univariate regressions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…2 Beaver and Manegold (1975), and Ismail and Kim (1989) confirm prior findings about the significant relationship between market betas and earnings betas, using a variety of accounting return variables. Karels and Sackley (1993) find a similar relationship in the U.S. banking industry. Baginski and Wahlen (2003) show that accounting betas are significantly related to the priced risk premiums in univariate regressions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…the benchmark). However, Karels and Sackley (1993) analyze the relationship between market betas and accounting betas in the US banking industry and have found significant correlations. In addition, in the short run, returns from MFI investment are based on past performance, e.g.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Several studies 12 have analyzed the relationship between accounting betas and market betas, and have generally found significant correlations. For example, one study finds significant correlations between accounting betas and market betas in the banking industry, ranging from thirty to sixty percent, depending on the market index employed [Karels and Sackley, 1993]. Such empirical evidence combined with the approach of using parameters of emerging market institutions in general as well as emerging market commercial banks as benchmarks, suggests that it is possible to derive -at least in terms of relative market risk -meaningful conclusions from this approach.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variables 1 and 2 are used as profitability indicators, and variables 3 and 4 indicate changes in the value of assets, while variable 5 is an indicator of the 12 See, for example, Ball and Brown (1996), Beaver, Kettler and Scholes (1970), Gonedes (1973), Beaver and Manegold (1975), Kulkarni, Powers and Shanon (1991) and Karels and Sackley (1993) 13 Measured in terms of portfolio at risk > 30 days / gross loans for MFIs and impaired loans / gross loans for EMCBs loan portfolio quality. Variables 1 to 5 for financial institutions (variables 1 to 3 for non-financial institutions) are assumed to capture key changes in the fundamental value of an institution, which ultimately defines its market value.…”
Section: Loan Portfolio At Risk (Par) 13mentioning
confidence: 99%