2006
DOI: 10.1088/1009-9271/6/4/11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship between Magnetic Gradient and Magnetic Shear in Five Super Active Regions Producing Great Flares

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prasad (2000) used the similar parameter of the magnetic gradient to characterize the stressed magnetic fields in active regions. Wang et al (2006) found a close correlation between magnetic shear and magnetic gradient; both can be used as a good proxy to predict flares. This was further demonstrated by statistical studies Jing et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Prasad (2000) used the similar parameter of the magnetic gradient to characterize the stressed magnetic fields in active regions. Wang et al (2006) found a close correlation between magnetic shear and magnetic gradient; both can be used as a good proxy to predict flares. This was further demonstrated by statistical studies Jing et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…To characterize the nonpotentiality of the active region, we calculate magnetic shearS, defined as the product of field strength and shear angle 37,38 :S = |B| · θ ,…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonpotentiality can be evaluated using magnetic shearS, which is computed here as the product of field strength and shear angle (Wang et al 1994(Wang et al , 2006Jing et al 2008):…”
Section: Change Of Cmf Topology Inferred From Nlfff Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%