The relationship between lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), diagnostic indicators of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and erectile dysfunction in patients with moderate to severely symptomatic BPH

Özayar, Asım; Zümrütbaş, Ali Ersin; Yaman, Önder

doi:10.1007/s11255-008-9386-z

Cited by 29 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[9,10] Indeed, in a cohort of men scheduled for the surgical management of LUTS/BPH, 36% with moderate LUTS/BPH and 94% with severe LUTS/BPH were found to have coexisting ED. [11] In recent decades, LUTS/BPH was regarded as an independent risk factor of ED in aging men. [12] …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The impact of surgical treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia on male erectile function

Chen

Wang

et al. 2016

Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)/benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is common in adult men and can impair erectile function (EF). It was believed surgical treatments for this illness can improve EF due to the relief of LUTS while they were also reported harmed EF as heating or injury effect. Current network meta-analysis aimed to elucidate this discrepancy.Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. Direct comparisons were conducted by STATA and network meta-analysis was conducted by Generate Mixed Treatment Comparison. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled standard mean difference and 95% confidence intervals and to incorporate variation between studies.Eighteen RCTs with 2433 participants were analyzed. Nine approaches were studied as transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP), plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP), Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), Holmium laser resection of the prostate (HoLRP), photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP), Thulium laser, open prostatectomy (OP), and laparoscopic simple prostatectomy (LSP). In direct comparisons, all surgical treatments did not decrease postoperative International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5 score except PVP. Moreover, patients who underwent HoLEP, PKEP, Thulium laser, and TURP had their postoperative EF significantly increased. Network analysis including direct and indirect comparisons ranked LSP at the highest position on the variation of postoperative IIEF-5 score, followed by PKRP, HoLEP, TURP, Thulium laser, PKEP, PVP, HoLRP, and OP. In subgroup analysis, only PVP was found lower postoperative EF in the short term and decreased baseline group, whereas TURP increased postoperative IIEF-5 score only for patients with normal baseline EF. However, HoLEP and PKEP showed pro-erectile effect even for patients with decreased baseline EF and short-term follow-up. Our novel data demonstrating surgical treatments for LUTS/BPH showed no negative impact on postoperative EF except PVP. Moreover, HoLEP and PKEP were found pro-erectile effect for all subgroups. New technologies, such as LSP, PKRP, and Thulium laser, were ranked at top positions in the network analysis, although they had no pro-erectile effect in direct comparison due to limited original studies or poor baseline EF. Therefore, further studies and longer follow-up are required to substantiate our findings.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The impact of surgical treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia on male erectile function

Chen

Wang

et al. 2016

Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Given the potential impact of the same on sexual function, it is essential to evaluate the presence of ED patients before starting treatment of BPH (26). …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Correlation of Subjective Symptoms in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Erectile Dysfunction

Kardasevic

Miličević

2017

Med Arch

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction:Epidemiological studies suggest a link between the symptoms of lower urinary tract (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and erectile dysfunction (ED). Increasing expected period of life, justify the interest of establishing correlations LUTS / BPH and ED in order to find more efficient ways of treating these pathologies.Goal:The objective was to evaluate the correlation of symptoms in LUTS/BPH with the degree of ED.Patients and Methods:The study was conducted as a prospective study which involved males aged 40-60 yr with present symptoms of LUTS/BPH. All study subjects underwent quantification of subjective symptoms through the International Prostate Symptom Score-IPSS and International Index of Erectile Dysfunction- IIEF-5. The first group of respondents had IPSS 0-8, second group IPSS 9-19 and the third group IPSS 20 to 35.Results:The results of ANOVA (F = 112.492, p = 0.000) showed that there was a statistically significant difference (p <0.05) between groups in degree of erectile function (IIEF). Tahmane test showed that there was a statistically significant difference between the first and second group (p = 0.000 <0.05), the first and third group (p = 0.000 <0.05) and the second and third group (p = 0.000 <0.05). Mean degree of ED correlates with IPSS. The results of Fisher’s exact test (p = 0.000) confirmed that there was a statistically significant relationship (p <0.05) between the IPSS score and degree of erectile dysfunction (IIEF).Conclusion:Elderly patients have a significantly higher value of IPSS score compared to younger patients. The degree of erectile dysfunction is correlated with symptoms of IPSS score. Severity of symptoms of LUTS/BPH and higher IPSS score, worsens the ED. Results of IIEF-5 score are inversely proportional with symptoms of IPSS score, and increase in IPSS score comes to a decline in IIEF score.

show abstract

“…In 453 men with planned surgery for LUTS/BPH, the incidence of co-existing ED increased with LUTS severity from 36% in men with moderate LUTS to 94% in men with severe LUTS [26]. …”

Section: Epidemiology In the Global Populationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) and LUTS/BPH with Erectile Dysfunction in Asian Men: A Systematic Review Focusing on Tadalafil

Park

Won

Sorsaburu

et al. 2013

World J Mens Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This review assesses lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with or without erectile dysfunction (ED) and related therapies focusing on tadalafil. A literature search was obtained and reviewed for the epidemiology, treatment therapies, pathophysiology, and efficacy and safety of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5i) tadalafil in patients with LUTS/BPH. Approximately 42% of men aged 51 to 60 years have BPH. Approximately 90% of men aged 45 to 80 years have LUTS. Occurrence of LUTS increases with age for almost all racial/ethnic groups (range, 32% to 56%) with prevalence of LUTS highest among Hispanic men, then Blacks, Caucasians, and Asians. There is an independent relationship with LUTS/BPH and ED, with approximately 70% of men with LUTS/BPH having ED with severity of one disease often correlating with the other. The European Urological Association guidelines include the use of the PDE5i tadalafil. Tadalafil is the only therapy recommended for treatment of co-existing BPH and ED, while other therapies have unwanted ED side effects. The mode of action of tadalafil may involve different areas of the lower urinary tract such as smooth muscle cell relaxation in the bladder neck, prostate, and urethra, but there may also be resulting modulation of the afferent nerve activity. Tadalafil (5 mg) in Asian men with LUTS/BPH, similar to global studies, is efficacious and safe. Tadalafil (5 mg) improves co-existing LUTS/BPH and ED, independently. Men with LUTS/BPH likely also have ED. Asian men with LUTS/BPH have similar incidence rates, co-existing ED, comorbid diseases, and risks as non-Asian men. Tadalafil can improve co-existing LUTS/BPH and ED.

show abstract

The relationship between lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), diagnostic indicators of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and erectile dysfunction in patients with moderate to severely symptomatic BPH

Abstract: The presence of LUTS, particularly severe LUTS, is an independent risk factor for ED. It is crucial to assess ED of the patient before BPH surgery, otherwise ED may be regarded as an outcome of the surgery rather than a preoperative, already existing condition.

Cited by 29 publications

References 22 publications

The impact of surgical treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia on male erectile function

The impact of surgical treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia on male erectile function

Correlation of Subjective Symptoms in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Erectile Dysfunction

Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) and LUTS/BPH with Erectile Dysfunction in Asian Men: A Systematic Review Focusing on Tadalafil

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About