2021
DOI: 10.1177/0958305x211053621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between LNG price, LNG revenue, non-LNG revenue and government spending in China: An empirical analysis based on the ARDL and SVAR model

Abstract: The present paper examines the dynamic relationship between liquefied natural gas (LNG) price, LNG revenue, non-LNG revenue and government spending (GOVS) in China using autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) and structural vector auto-regressive (SVAR) model. The goal of carrying out ARDL and SVAR together is to consolidate and strengthen the consistency of the results obtained from both approaches. ARDL results show that a positive influence relationship between both short-run and long-run LNG prices, LNG rev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the VAR model does not set any constraint conditions and simply reflects the dynamic relationship between endogenous variables. It does not explicitly explain the meaning of economic structure among endogenous variables in the model, that is, it ignores the implied economic structure among endogenous variables and the influence relationship of endogenous variables over the same period to a certain extent [ 25 ]. Based on these defects of the VAR model, in this paper we constructed a 6-variable SVAR(P) model to analyze the dynamic influence mechanism of residents’ age characteristics, residents’ household registration characteristics, residents’ gender characteristics, residents’ education characteristics and residents’ marriage characteristics on the demand for commercial health insurance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the VAR model does not set any constraint conditions and simply reflects the dynamic relationship between endogenous variables. It does not explicitly explain the meaning of economic structure among endogenous variables in the model, that is, it ignores the implied economic structure among endogenous variables and the influence relationship of endogenous variables over the same period to a certain extent [ 25 ]. Based on these defects of the VAR model, in this paper we constructed a 6-variable SVAR(P) model to analyze the dynamic influence mechanism of residents’ age characteristics, residents’ household registration characteristics, residents’ gender characteristics, residents’ education characteristics and residents’ marriage characteristics on the demand for commercial health insurance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, since the SVAR model was adopted in this paper (the verifications of the basic assumptions of the SVAR model are shown in Table A2 and Table A3 in Appendix A of this paper), which reflects the economic structure relationship between variables [ 25 ], the Granger causality test was not necessary. Based on the research purpose and empirical research, this paper recognizes the following conclusions: “age”, “sex”, “married”, “urban” and “edu” are the Granger causes of “lnhealthins”.…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the traditional co-integration model, the ARDL cointegration model has a number of advantages. Firstly, ARDL does not require the implementation of the same integrating sequence for all variables in the model (we can use the 0 order or I (0) integration of the data variable and the 1 order or I (1) integration for the analysis) (Mohammed and Ruslee, 2015;Hao, 2021). Secondly, the ARDL co-integration method is more suitable for sequence data with small sample size, and the processing and interpretation of the data in the analysis process is relatively simple.…”
Section: Model Construction and Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Pesaran et al (2001), whether or not to reject the null hypothesis is determined by comparing the F-statistic of the correlation co-efficient in the F-test with the critical value of the ARDL co-integration co-efficient of the critical value of the maximum asymptotic spread of the F-statistic (Hao, 2021). However, as the selected sample size is rather small, we compare the value of the model F-statistic with the threshold value of the asymptotic distribution of the F-statistic suggested by Narayan (2005).…”
Section: Model Construction and Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation