The relationship between living environment, well-being and lifestyle behaviours in young women in Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

There has been increasing interest in understanding the influence of the living environment on individual and population health. While our understanding of the connection is growing, there has been limited published research focusing on socially and economically transitioning countries such as Iran or specific populations such as young women. This study explores the relationship between the physical and social living environment with well-being outcomes and lifestyle behaviours of young women in Shiraz, Iran, in 2013. Using a cluster convenience sampling technique, 391 young Iranian women with the mean age of 27.3 (SD: 4.8) participated in a cross-sectional survey (response rate 93%). A scale adapted from the British General Household Social Capital scale was used to assess living environment characteristics. The International Health and Behaviour survey, Satisfaction with Life Scale (SwL) and WHO Quality of Life questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) were used to measure lifestyle behaviours and well-being. The findings showed a moderate level of satisfaction with participants' living environment, with a mean score of 38.5 (SD: 7.7; score range: 11-45). There were correlations between physical and social neighbourhood environment, lifestyle behaviours and well-being outcomes (P < 0.05). Multiple regression analysis showed that the characteristics of living environments were determinants of quality of life (QoL), including physical, psychological, social and environmental QoL, as well as SwL (P < 0.05). Perceptions of individuals about their living environment issues were associated with demographic variables including ethnicity, income, level of education and occupation status. The current study shows how characteristics of the physical and social living environments play a significant role in shaping well-being and lifestyle behaviours among young Iranian women. Hence, there is a need for more focused attention to the meaning, measurement and building of neighbourhood livability, including both physical and social aspects of neighbourhood, in order to support QoL and SwL among young Iranian women, and enhance their healthy lifestyle behaviours.

Consequences of living environment insecurity on health and well‐being in southwest China: The role of community cohesion and social support

“…Our findings contribute to the existing literature, first, by demonstrating that community‐living environments are predictors of residents' health and well‐being. The results of this study updated current knowledge on the relationship between community‐living environments and health and well‐being among residents across broader geographical settings as previous studies were either conducted within Western contexts or urban communities in China (Diez Roux & Mair, 2010; Guo et al, 2021; Ng et al, 2018; Salehi et al, 2017). Second, we demonstrate that an enhanced level of cohesion among community residents—based on reciprocity and mutual trust—would effectively reduce the negative impact of environment insecurity on individual health and well‐being.…”

Measuring the Association of Self-Perceived Physical and Social Neighborhood Environment with Health of Chinese Rural Residents

“…Although previous studies have examined the associations between self-perceived neighborhood environment and health [28][29][30], most were conducted in other countries or using the samples of urban residents, which were different from the social, economic and political contexts of rural areas with underdeveloped facilities. For example, Schulz et al [31] examined the contributions of neighborhood characteristics in explaining associations between neighborhood poverty and residents' cumulative biological risk in an urban community.…”

Competence and Satisfaction in Occupational Performance Among a Sample of University Students: An Exploratory Study

“…The university environment can impact choice of and participation in occupation, and context can influence well-being by promoting or limiting occupational choice (American Occupational Therapy Association, 2015; Hall, McKinstry, & Hyett, 2015; Salehi, Harris, Sebar, & Coyne, 2017). The university environment allows students to engage in more social activities and leisure interests than non-university students, and the advantage of this participation helps students well beyond the university years (Maunder, Cunliffe, Galvin, Mjali, & Rogers, 2013).…”