2011
DOI: 10.18848/1833-1882/cgp/v06i03/51756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship between Leadership Style and Employee Stress: An Empirical Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The previous research suggests that the experience with workaholism and occupational burnout may be different due to certain sociodemographic characteristics of employees (Lopez et al, 2011;Kompier, 2006;Andreassen, 2014). Furthermore, some studies have reported an association between a perceived ethical leadership style and employees' age, gender, education, work duration in the current organization (Mitonga-Monga & Cilliers, 2016;Feng, 2011).…”
Section: Importance Of An Ethical Leadership Style For the Relationshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous research suggests that the experience with workaholism and occupational burnout may be different due to certain sociodemographic characteristics of employees (Lopez et al, 2011;Kompier, 2006;Andreassen, 2014). Furthermore, some studies have reported an association between a perceived ethical leadership style and employees' age, gender, education, work duration in the current organization (Mitonga-Monga & Cilliers, 2016;Feng, 2011).…”
Section: Importance Of An Ethical Leadership Style For the Relationshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organizational leadership has been shown to be the most prominent predictor of employee stress, as it was found that ineffective leaders diminish the well-being of followers by causing emotional exhaustion and occupational stress (Dehue et al, 2012;Lopez et al, 2011;Skakon, Nielsen, Borg, & Guzman, 2010). Common forms of ineffective leadership that relate to occupational stress have predominantly been explored as abusive leadership (Boddy, 2011;Harris et al, 2011;Krasikova, 2013;Liu, Liao, & Loi, 2012;Mawritz, Mayer, Hoobler, Wayne, & Marinova, 2012;Pelletier, 2010;Rispens, Giebels, & Jehn, 2010;Tepper, Moss, & Duffy, 2011), tyrannical leadership (Ashforth, 1997;Kant, Skogstad, Torsheim, & Einarsen, 2013;Samnani & Singh, 2013), and destructive leadership (Aasland, Skogstad, Notelaers, Nielsen, & Einarsen, 2010;Hobfoll, 2011;McCarthy, Darcy, & Grady, 2010;Schyns & Schilling, 2013;Shaw et al, 2011;Starratt & Grandy, 2010;Thoroughgood, Tate, Sawyer, & Jacobs, 2012;Wang, Sinclair, & Deese, 2010).…”
Section: Forms Of Ineffective Leadership Related To Occupational Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with previous findings, ineffective and destructive leadership has been associated with diminished wellbeing and job satisfaction, employee distress, and burnout (Harris et al, 2011;Kelloway & Barling, 2010); workplace bullying was associated with depression, feelings of helplessness, irritability, low self-esteem, maladjustment, mood swings, paranoia, physical symptoms, social isolation, anxiety, burnout, decreased job satisfaction, and well-being (Galanaki & Papalexandris, 2013); and destructive leadership has been shown to decrease the effectiveness, well-being, motivation, and job satisfaction of followers (Aasland et al, 2010;Starratt & Grandy, 2010). Research has shown that leadership predicts employee stress (Dehue et al, 2012), causing effects on follower performance, job well-being (Lopez et al, 2011), health, and sickness absence due to overstrain and fatigue (Westerlund et al, 2010). Each of the participants reported overstrain, fatigue, and negative personal well-being as a direct result of working with the perceived ineffective leader (Dehue et al, 2012;Kelloway & Barling, 2010;Lopez et al, 2011;Restubog et al, 2011;Schyns & Schilling, 2013).…”
Section: Rq2: What Are the Lived Experiences Of Occupational Stress mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some earlier studies revealed that tension and stress are more often experienced by employees who have higher education (Michailidis, & Georgiou, 2005;Watson, Deary, Thompson, & Li, 2008;Rudman, & Gustavsson, 2012). They are more ambitious and more demanding for themselves, and this leads to a greater probability of occupational burnout (Lopez, Green, Carmody-Bubb, & Kodatt, 2011;Kompier, 2006). Furthermore, Antoniou, Polychroni & Vlachakis (2006), Rupert & Kent (2007) claim that younger employees get tired more often than older.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%