2018
DOI: 10.1111/ibi.12648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between latitude, migration and the evolution of bird song complexity

Abstract: For the past several decades it has been proposed that birds show latitudinal variation in song complexity. How universal this variation may be and what factors generate it, however, are still largely unknown. Furthermore, while migration is confounded with latitude, migratory behaviour alone may also be associated with variation in song complexity. In this paper we review the literature to assess current ideas on how latitude and migratory behaviour may drive large-scale geographical patterns of song complexi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, support for an association between latitude and song complexity is mixed. About half of the studies on this topic find no support for this or even the opposite pattern (reviewed in Najar & Benedict, 2019 ). Variation in these findings could be due to which song metrics are compared within each of these studies (Benedict & Najar, 2019 ) to different evolutionary pressures acting on different aspects of song structure (e.g., sexual selective pressures vs. morphological constraints; Cardoso & Hu, 2011 ; Derryberry et al, 2012 ; Greig et al, 2013 ), or to a lack of association between latitude and the expected life‐history traits in the species examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, support for an association between latitude and song complexity is mixed. About half of the studies on this topic find no support for this or even the opposite pattern (reviewed in Najar & Benedict, 2019 ). Variation in these findings could be due to which song metrics are compared within each of these studies (Benedict & Najar, 2019 ) to different evolutionary pressures acting on different aspects of song structure (e.g., sexual selective pressures vs. morphological constraints; Cardoso & Hu, 2011 ; Derryberry et al, 2012 ; Greig et al, 2013 ), or to a lack of association between latitude and the expected life‐history traits in the species examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted December 18, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.18.472638 doi: bioRxiv preprint (Spencer et al 2003;Sawant et al 2021;L. Z. Garamszegi, Balsby, and Bell 2005;Najar and Benedict 2019). These measures of immediate diversity have shown promising results in understanding the diversity across multiple fields of biology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The immediate diversity of the notes in birdsongs is often studied using some of the conventional measures-Shannon’s Diversity (Kershenbaum 2014; Sasahara et al 2015; Silva et al 2000), Simpson’s Diversity (Simpson 1949; Magnussen and Boyle 1995), and the types of notes within a song or Note Diversity (Spencer et al 2003; Sawant et al 2021; L. Z. Garamszegi, Balsby, and Bell 2005; Najar and Benedict 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 and 2). Such a comparative framework has been successfully employed to test hypotheses that explain differences between migratory and nonmigratory (sedentary) bird taxa in their coloration (Fitzpatrick et al, 2004), vocal complexity (Najar & Benedict, 2019;Nelson, Marler, & Morton, 1996), breeding phenology (Kimmitt, Sinkiewicz, & Ketterson, 2020), and fitness (Buchan, Gilroy, Catry, & Franco, 2020), as well as a history of linking morphology with diet or foraging guild (Tellería, Blázquez, De La Hera, & Pérez-Tris, 2013;Neto et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%