2018
DOI: 10.5958/0974-9357.2018.00065.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between item difficulty and Non-Functioning distractors of multiple choice questions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was a moderate negative correlation between the frequency of NFDs per item and the item’s discrimination ability for both test versions: r = - 0.44 and -0.38 for the three and five options, respectively, p- value = 0.00 . This is consistent with previous studies [ 37 , 38 ]. This finding is essential for further proving the importance of designing effective and plausible distractors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…There was a moderate negative correlation between the frequency of NFDs per item and the item’s discrimination ability for both test versions: r = - 0.44 and -0.38 for the three and five options, respectively, p- value = 0.00 . This is consistent with previous studies [ 37 , 38 ]. This finding is essential for further proving the importance of designing effective and plausible distractors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…A score greater than 0.35 indicates excellent discrimination, 0.25-0.34 is "good," 0.15-0.24 "marginal," and less than 0.15 indicates "poor" discrimination (Abdulghani et al, 2014). • Distractor Efficiency (DE): distractors (answers) selected by more than 5% of students are considered acceptable (D'Sa et al, 2018).…”
Section: • the Discrimination Index (Di)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrimination index (DI) helps differentiate between high and low scores (D'Sa et al, 2018). The index is based upon a percentage of the higher scores of the exam and the lower scores of the exam.…”
Section: Test Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation