The Relationship between Injury and Socioeconomic Status in Reference to the Fourth Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study aims to investigate the relationship between the total injury experience rate and socioeconomic status based on the fourth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES).MethodsBy analyzing data from the fourth KNHANES conducted from 2007 to 2009, we estimated the injury experience rate according to socioeconomic status, including the occupational characteristics of 11,837 subjects. Setting the injury experience rate as a dependent variable and socioeconomic status as an independent variable, we performed logistic regression to calculate odds ratios reflecting the likelihood of injury according to socioeconomic status while controlling for relevant covariates.ResultsIn 797 subjects who had injury experience over the past 1 year, 290 persons (36.4%) had a work-related injury. As their income, home value, and educational status increased, their injury experiences decreased. Among occupational groups, the craft, equipment, machine operating, and assembling workers showed the highest rate (10.6%) of injury experience, and the lowest rate (5.7%) was found in the unemployed group. After adjusting for the confounding variables, the experience of injury was significantly related to several socioeconomic factors: high income (OR = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.34-0.86), high home value (OR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.43-0.96), low education status (OR = 1.28; 95% CI: 1.07-1.52), and specific occupations such as craft, equipment, machine operating, and assembling work (OR = 1.99; 95% CI: 1.60-2.47), skilled agriculture, forestry and fishery work (OR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.02-2.01), and simple labor (OR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.04-1.82).ConclusionsThe injury experience rate differed depending on the socioeconomic status. A negative correlation was found between the injury experience rate and income, low home value, and education level. Moreover, a higher rate of injury experience was found in occupation groups and physical worker groups in comparison to the unemployed group and white-collar worker groups. This study would be useful in selecting appropriate priorities for injury management in Korea.

Relationship between neighborhood socioeconomic status and venous thromboembolism: results from a population‐based study

“…These health issues are often less prevalent among individuals with higher socioeconomic status. Furthermore, acquired risk factors for VTE, such as immobilization as a result of physical inactivity or trauma/injury as a result of occupational risks, are less common among the socially advantaged . However, more research is needed to explain which factors are responsible for the decreased risk of venous thromboembolism in higher socioeconomic groups and to identify what interventions could lower the risk in individuals with a lower socioeconomic status.…”

The impact of occupation according to income on depressive symptoms in South Korean individuals: Findings from the Korean Welfare Panel Study

“…In line with this explanation, blue collar and sales and service workers in South Korea exhibit specific characteristics. Regarding blue collar workers, studies have shown that the occurrence rate of injury-related fatalities is highest in South Korea among OECD countries and that the skilled agricultural, forestry, and fishery workers, craft, equipment, machine operating, and assembling workers, and elementary workers exhibit a higher likelihood of experiencing injuries (S.-K. Kim et al, 2014). When considering that occupational injury is a notable risk factor for depression, with injured workers being more likely to suffer depression, these fundamental characteristics of blue collar workers may serve as a reason for the higher depression scores shown (Asfaw & Souza, 2012).…”

Environmental, Spatial, and Sociodemographic Factors Associated with Nonfatal Injuries in Indonesia

“…Kim and coworkers [5] found that agriculture workers have higher odds compared to unemployed (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03–1.09). However, being employed, a student, and an entrepreneur is significantly associated with lower injury incidence, as opposed to being unemployed.…”

“…Moreover, Kim and colleagues' [5] and Yiengprugsawan and colleagues' [6] studies found a negative relationship between income and injury experience. Furthermore, poor housing conditions are associated with a broad range of health conditions, including injuries and mental health [7].…”