2020
DOI: 10.1080/15140326.2020.1816131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between income inequality and savings: evidence from household‐level panel data in Vietnam

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to address whether province-level income inequality is associated with household savings, as well as investigate how this relationship varies across different subgroups. The paper uses a unique balanced panel survey on access to resources of 2181 rural households between 2008 and 2014 in twelve provinces of Vietnam. An instrumental variablegeneralized method of moments approach aimed to tackle the issue of the endogeneity is applied to estimate relationships between relevant variab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Household size is an individual characteristic exogenous to the model and it has proven capability of explaining income (Espenshade et al, 1983; Lazear and Michael, 1980). The previous literature in economics has used household size to instrument household savings (Tran et al, 2020), which are a fraction of household income, and unobservable income variables such as permanent income (Scoggins, 2001). The uncertainty introduced from the first stage of Model 3 is corrected by recalculating the standard errors using 1000 replications of bootstrap resampling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Household size is an individual characteristic exogenous to the model and it has proven capability of explaining income (Espenshade et al, 1983; Lazear and Michael, 1980). The previous literature in economics has used household size to instrument household savings (Tran et al, 2020), which are a fraction of household income, and unobservable income variables such as permanent income (Scoggins, 2001). The uncertainty introduced from the first stage of Model 3 is corrected by recalculating the standard errors using 1000 replications of bootstrap resampling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%