The relationship between human rights and refugee protection: an empirical analysis

Abstract

What is the relationship between a government's respect for the rights of its own citizens and that government's regard for refugee rights? On one hand, we may expect that a country with high human rights standards will also offer a higher quality of asylum. Domestic laws that protect citizens' rights may be extended to refugees, for example. On the other hand, there are reasons to theorize that a country with high human rights standards may offer a lower quality of asylum. For instance, governments may claim that protecting citizens' wellbeing necessitates the rejection of refugees. To explore these questions, I analyse a global dataset drawn from reports by the US Committee for Refugees and Immigrants. I find that the relationship between citizens' rights and refugee rights is modified by economic conditions and the size of the refugee population. Moreover, some domestic rights (like freedom of movement and labor rights) may increase protections for refugees, while others (like rule of law) may decrease them. Refugees have been largely absent from the literature on the politics of human rights. By systematically examining the relationship between human and refugee rights worldwide, this paper fills an important gap in the scholarly and policy literature.

Health and social consequences of human rights violations in Rural Nigeria

“…As contained in most constitutions of many African countries, virtually everybody enjoys fundamental human rights (Anon, 2020; Einolf, 2020; Rubenson, 2002; Steele et al., 2020; Slye, 1994). This suggests that people should not be deprived of their right to life unless they have been convicted of an offense that demands restitution (Anon, 2020; Abdelaaty, 2021; Madlingozi, 2018; Nzarga, 2014; Steele et al, 2020). The Nigerian constitution, which was drafted from the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that every citizen has the right to life, entitled to respect for the dignity of his or her person, rights to freedom from discrimination, freedom to vote and be voted for, freedom of worship, right to private life, right to peaceful assembly and association, etc.…”