2017
DOI: 10.1044/2016_ajslp-15-0022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship Between Grammatical Development and Disfluencies in Preschool Children Who Stutter and Those Who Recover

Abstract: The results partially corroborate the dual diathesis stressor model. Disfluencies significantly decreased in CWS-R as grammatical abilities (not age) increased. Language development may serve as a protective factor or catalyst for recovery for CWS-R. As grammatical ability grew and the gap between linguistic ability and demand decreased; however, none of the three groups was more likely to produce disfluencies in longer and more complex utterances.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, persisting children did not differ significantly from recovered children on measures of receptive vocabulary 0.20]). When expressive vocabulary data fromSinger et al (2019a) andKefalianos et al (2017) were excluded, there was an insufficient number of studies to conduct a meta-analysis.The length of language samples analyzed varied across studies:Kloth et al (1999) analyzed 10-min speech samples,Hollister et al (2017) analyzed 100-utterance speech samples,Buhr (2007) analyzed 50-utterance speech samples, andWatkins et al (1999) analyzed 250-to 300-utterance speech samples. Further,Hollister et al (2017) hand calculated IPSYN, whereasKloth et al (1999) used a computer program.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, persisting children did not differ significantly from recovered children on measures of receptive vocabulary 0.20]). When expressive vocabulary data fromSinger et al (2019a) andKefalianos et al (2017) were excluded, there was an insufficient number of studies to conduct a meta-analysis.The length of language samples analyzed varied across studies:Kloth et al (1999) analyzed 10-min speech samples,Hollister et al (2017) analyzed 100-utterance speech samples,Buhr (2007) analyzed 50-utterance speech samples, andWatkins et al (1999) analyzed 250-to 300-utterance speech samples. Further,Hollister et al (2017) hand calculated IPSYN, whereasKloth et al (1999) used a computer program.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work has recently been replicated using 3 years of language samples from children in the ISRP; recovered children show steeper growth in expressive language complexity than do peers who were still stuttering at the conclusion of that project (Hsu et al, in review). Similarly, in a smaller sample tracked at Iowa (Hollister et al, 2017), researchers found that higher levels of expressive grammatical development over an 18-month period were associated with recovery in a sample of preschool CWS between 28 and 43 months of age. In another small sample of Korean recovered and persistent CWS (Lee et al, 2019), persistently stuttering children showed lower language skills at first visit than those who recovered; slower development of accurate case marker use still distinguished these children from peers who recovered over an 18-month period.…”
Section: Language Factors That Appear To Influence Recovery From Earl...mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For some children, stuttering can persist to adulthood, whereas others may recover without treatment (Bloodstein & Bernstein Ratner, 2008 ; Bloodstein et al, 2021 ; Yairi & Ambrose, 2013 ). Recovery is reported to be associated with the development of more complex syntactic and grammatical skills (Hollister et al, 2017 ; Leech et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%