1958
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.104.437.1079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship Between Glucose Tolerance, Body Weight, and Clinical State in Melancholia

Abstract: In a recent investigation the present author has shown that glucose tolerance (G.T.) was significantly lower in a group of middle-aged mental hospital patients suffering from severe depression, than in a non-psychiatric group of similar age distribution (Pryce, 1958). This observation is similar to many others reported earlier (see review by McFarland and Goldstein, 1939). The cause of this impairment of G.T. is unknown; it cannot be explained by defective absorption of glucose from the alimentary canal since … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1964
1964
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies on the oGTT in patients with mental disorders show distur bances of carbohydrate metabolism primarily during acute endogenousdepressive episodes compared to the 'free interval' (Pryce, 1958 In conclusion, we consider the present findings to show an increase in the frequency of impaired glucose tolerance in manic-depressive and schizo-affective patients under long-term lithium treatment. It is, however, unlikely that the impairment is a primary and direct effect of lithium.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Previous studies on the oGTT in patients with mental disorders show distur bances of carbohydrate metabolism primarily during acute endogenousdepressive episodes compared to the 'free interval' (Pryce, 1958 In conclusion, we consider the present findings to show an increase in the frequency of impaired glucose tolerance in manic-depressive and schizo-affective patients under long-term lithium treatment. It is, however, unlikely that the impairment is a primary and direct effect of lithium.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%