2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01616.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship Between Global and Regional Distribution Diminishes Among Phylogenetically Basal Species

Abstract: Abstract. Phylogenetic legacy and phylogenetic trends affect the ecology of species-except, apparently, for the width of their distribution. As a result, ''macroecological'' patterns of species distributions emerge constantly in phylogenetically very distinct species assemblages. The width of the global distribution of species, for instance, constantly correlates positively to the width of their regional distribution. However, such patterns primarily reflect the phylogenetically derived species that dominate m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This agrees with the observed correlation between global and local abundance in young species, but not in old. Old species are probably less competitive in a similarly broad spectrum of biotopes as young species [7]. Class II-V punctuational theories of evolution also predict that the paleontological record will more often show a gradual change from common to rare species rather than the opposite change from rare to common species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This agrees with the observed correlation between global and local abundance in young species, but not in old. Old species are probably less competitive in a similarly broad spectrum of biotopes as young species [7]. Class II-V punctuational theories of evolution also predict that the paleontological record will more often show a gradual change from common to rare species rather than the opposite change from rare to common species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One asterisk denotes the predictions that have not been intentionally tested but are supported by published data. 1 [57], 2 [58], 3 [59,60], 4 [17], 5 [61], 6 [62], 7 [45], 8 [63,64], 9 [65], 10 [66-68], 11 [69,70]. For explanation see [46] and (Flegr J.: Microevolutionary a macroevolutionary implication of Frozen plasticity theory of adaptive evolution, submitted).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used RD as a proxy of the age of species: a higher number of nodes indicates a more derived taxon (‘clade rank’ in [29]). We obtained RD values from the mammal phylogenetic tree resolved to the species level presented by Bininda-Emonds et al [30], which integrates the Jones et al [31] pre-existing supertree for the Chiroptera.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These node based MRD values are approximate measures the evolutionary development [29] of the local fauna in each cell of the grid. Even if RD contains no direct information on the ages of taxonomic groups, it is still a useful metric for phylogenies lacking branch lengths [32] because although evolutionary rates may have not been the same in all clades, higher numbers of nodes represent a younger species in the majority of radiation phenomena.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%