2000
DOI: 10.3233/bmr-2000-14303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between five measures of trunk strength

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No studies could be found for adults or children in which values for dynamic back extensor endurance were correlated with static, isometric back extensor strength. However, our findings support those of Kroll, Machado, Happy, Leong, and Chen (2000) who found a very weak correlation ( r = .01) when testing the relationship between isometric extension endurance (Biering-Sorensen test) and isometric extensor force. It appears that dynamic or static endurance and isometric strength test different components of muscular function (Kroll, et al, 2000).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…No studies could be found for adults or children in which values for dynamic back extensor endurance were correlated with static, isometric back extensor strength. However, our findings support those of Kroll, Machado, Happy, Leong, and Chen (2000) who found a very weak correlation ( r = .01) when testing the relationship between isometric extension endurance (Biering-Sorensen test) and isometric extensor force. It appears that dynamic or static endurance and isometric strength test different components of muscular function (Kroll, et al, 2000).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, our findings support those of Kroll, Machado, Happy, Leong, and Chen (2000) who found a very weak correlation ( r = .01) when testing the relationship between isometric extension endurance (Biering-Sorensen test) and isometric extensor force. It appears that dynamic or static endurance and isometric strength test different components of muscular function (Kroll, et al, 2000). Differences in muscle fiber types and their recruitment during the different types and rates of contraction might explain differences in performance and the low correlations between isometric and dynamic tests (Kroll, et al, 2000).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The participants were instructed to attempt to straighten the upper part of their body, pulling up on the handle gradually without bending their knees, until they reached a maximum effort. The value displayed on the indicator in kilograms of force was recorded 13 14

Thirty-second sit-ups (number of repetitions): From the supine position, participants were asked to bend their knees at a 90° angle, with their arms folded over their chest.

…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participants were instructed to attempt to straighten the upper part of their body, pulling up on the handle gradually without bending their knees, until they reached a maximum effort. The value displayed on the indicator in kilograms of force was recorded 13 14…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%