2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18179281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship between Family Meals and Mental Health Problems in Japanese Elementary School Children: A Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract: The relative burden of mental health problems in children is increasing worldwide. Family meals have attracted attention as an effective modifiable factor for preventing children’s mental health problems. We examined the relationship between family meals and mental health problems in Japanese elementary schoolchildren. A cross-sectional, self-administered questionnaire survey was conducted with guardians of children aged 7 to 12 years in Gifu Prefecture, Japan. Frequency of family meals and with whom the child… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Children and adolescents who eat breakfast at home are more likely to do so in the presence of their family members. Thus, Kameyama et al ( 44 ) showed that children (aged 7–12 years) who ate breakfast with their families less than once a week and those who ate breakfast alone on weekends showed a greater prevalence of borderline or abnormal psychosocial health status than those who ate breakfast seven times a week and those who ate breakfast on weekends with their families, respectively. Furthermore, one study by Videon and Manning ( 45 ) indicated that adolescents who regularly used to eat out of home/missed family meals show a greater prevalence of skipping breakfast, as well as a lower quality diet (e.g., low intake of dairy products).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children and adolescents who eat breakfast at home are more likely to do so in the presence of their family members. Thus, Kameyama et al ( 44 ) showed that children (aged 7–12 years) who ate breakfast with their families less than once a week and those who ate breakfast alone on weekends showed a greater prevalence of borderline or abnormal psychosocial health status than those who ate breakfast seven times a week and those who ate breakfast on weekends with their families, respectively. Furthermore, one study by Videon and Manning ( 45 ) indicated that adolescents who regularly used to eat out of home/missed family meals show a greater prevalence of skipping breakfast, as well as a lower quality diet (e.g., low intake of dairy products).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the literature emphasises that children consuming breakfast with their family less than once a week, and those eating their weekend breakfast alone, displayed a higher occurrence of borderline/abnormal mental health status compared to those who declared consuming their breakfast 7 times a week, and weekend breakfast with their family members, respectively. These results indicate that family meals, especially breakfast, might promote better mental health among children [52]. Furthermore, other research concludes that skipping breakfast was habitual among schoolchildren.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The participatory work in the health-related workshops (BODY and FOOD) adopted a flipped-classroom approach [ 26 ] that allowed students to learn among themselves by using textual and visual materials supplied by teachers. In both workshops, we further encouraged students to talk with their family members about what they learned [ 27 ]. By incorporating such approaches, schools can function as hubs for building community resilience, in which teachers shift from being ‘experts’ to being facilitators who nurture the children’s own knowledge and expertise as well as support them in identifying learning issues that are important for themselves, for families, and for the wider community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average count of how many times each word was used in these sentences was 3. The top 5 most frequently used words (limited to nouns) were blood (used 33 times), figure (27), heart (18), lung (16), and pulse (16). The correspondence analysis (Figure 3) showed distinct differences in words among three groups, and the "no change" group (labeled as 0) was located closest to the origin.…”
Section: Text Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%