2013
DOI: 10.1080/21548455.2012.761366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship Between Exposure to Pseudoscientific Television Programmes and Pseudoscientific Beliefs among Taiwanese University Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the parties put forward their opinions with the claim of being scientific, but these claims are not systematic information emerging from a scientific methodology and have no chance of being confirmed either experimentally or theoretically (Swanson, 2016). When pseudoscientific claims are put forward as if they are scientific claims, society has difficulty to distinguishing between science and pseudoscience (Tseng et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the parties put forward their opinions with the claim of being scientific, but these claims are not systematic information emerging from a scientific methodology and have no chance of being confirmed either experimentally or theoretically (Swanson, 2016). When pseudoscientific claims are put forward as if they are scientific claims, society has difficulty to distinguishing between science and pseudoscience (Tseng et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a result was in compliance with research indicating that various pseudoscientific claims as telekinesis, astrology, lucky numbers, or so have considerably been approved by the community (Tobacyk & Milford, 1983;National Science Board [NSB], 2006;Moore, 2005), expected reasoning skills cannot be used when encountered with paranormal claims (Wang & Lin, 2005) and even individuals having education in science could not apply scientific knowledge and skills adequately in the process of evaluating pseudoscientific claims (Afonsoa & Gilbert, 2010;Johnson & Pigliucci, 2004;Losh & Nzekwe, 2011;Walker, Hoekstra & Vogl, 2002). The approval of those pseudoscientific claims by the community and educated individuals such as university students was warranted partly with the impact of television programs (Tseng, Tsai, Hsieh, Hung & Huang, 2014). Also Mugaloglu (2014) indicated that learners are accepted existing pseudoscientific beliefs because of exposing to alternative constructions through social negotiation than to furthering their appreciation of science.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated above, since pseudoscientific claims are presented with the label of being scientific, they hide behind the prestige of science and therefore it becomes difficult for individuals to determine them (Tseng, Tsai, Hsieh, Hung & Huang, 2014). Related research showed that many pseudoscientific claims such as spacemen, telekinetic, astrology, lucky numbers and etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding university students, pseudoscience beliefs are less prevalent in this population than in citizens with lower educational status (Macdonald et al, 2017a). However, university students also believe in pseudoscientific claims (Afonso & Gilbert, 2010;Peña & Paco, 2004;Tsai et al, 2015;Tseng et al, 2014). Furthermore, university students misinterpret the data presented in media reports of science, overestimating its analytic ability (Norris et al, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%