1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1075-2935(97)80006-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between essay reading style and scoring proficiency in a psychometric scoring system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
82
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
82
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is difficult to identify all criteria beforehand and in a concrete manner. In addition, various studies have shown that often assessors start with holistic evaluations, which inform their scoring with regard to individual criteria (Cumming et al, 2002;Sakyi, 2003;Vaughan, 1991;Wolfe, 1997). Moreover, when a text does not fit these criteria perfectly, assessors often adjust their scores (Lumley, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is difficult to identify all criteria beforehand and in a concrete manner. In addition, various studies have shown that often assessors start with holistic evaluations, which inform their scoring with regard to individual criteria (Cumming et al, 2002;Sakyi, 2003;Vaughan, 1991;Wolfe, 1997). Moreover, when a text does not fit these criteria perfectly, assessors often adjust their scores (Lumley, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Descriptions of the qualifications of raters have also been proposed (Powers et al 1998;). In addition, the nature of scoring expertise has been studied (Wolfe 1997;Wolfe et al 1998). Methods to capture and monitor rater effects during scoring as a function of rater characteristics are similarly relevant Myford and Mislevy 1995;Patz et al 2002).…”
Section: The Emergence Of a Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Provide training on how to score compositions (Shohamy, Gordon, & Kraemer, 1992) ' Use experienced raters to score papers (Schoonen, Verger, & Eiting, 1997;Underwood & Murphy, 1998;Wolfe, 1997;Wolfe, Kao, Ranney, 1998;Wolfe & Ranney, 1996) ' Have multiple raters score each paper (Bürgin & Hughes, 2009;Coffman, 1966;Gearhart, Herman, Novak, & Wolf, 1995;Godshalk, Swineford, & Coffman, 1966;Swartzetal., 1999). ' Base students' writing score on multiple writing tasks (Bürgin & Hughes, 2009;Finlayson, 1951;Godshalk Swineford, & Coffman, 1966;Lehman, 1990). '…”
Section: Make High-stakes Writing Assessments Fairmentioning
confidence: 99%