2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: Influence of family governance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
50
1
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
50
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the 54 works that explicitly define family firms, a first group of 12 articles defines the family firm based on only one criterion, namely, "self-perception" (five articles), "ownership" (six), and "management" (one), while a second group embraces 42 investigations using more than one definitional criterion, with "ownership" being used in all cases except in Zachary et al (2017) (see Table 3). Within this last group, Lee and Chu (2017) employ two alternative methods of identifying family firms. Furthermore, the dimensions and measures of EO used by the works reviewed reflect the almost complete dominance of the Miller gestalt approach (1983) and, to a lesser extent, the Lumpkin and Dess (1996) five-dimension approach (Table 3), which is similar to what occurs in the general literature (Rauch et al, 2009).…”
Section: Conceptualization and Measurement Of Family Firm And Eomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the 54 works that explicitly define family firms, a first group of 12 articles defines the family firm based on only one criterion, namely, "self-perception" (five articles), "ownership" (six), and "management" (one), while a second group embraces 42 investigations using more than one definitional criterion, with "ownership" being used in all cases except in Zachary et al (2017) (see Table 3). Within this last group, Lee and Chu (2017) employ two alternative methods of identifying family firms. Furthermore, the dimensions and measures of EO used by the works reviewed reflect the almost complete dominance of the Miller gestalt approach (1983) and, to a lesser extent, the Lumpkin and Dess (1996) five-dimension approach (Table 3), which is similar to what occurs in the general literature (Rauch et al, 2009).…”
Section: Conceptualization and Measurement Of Family Firm And Eomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, some scholars find that the EO-performance link does not differ between these two types of firms (Campbell & Park, 2016) or differs only for lone founder firms (Miller & Le Breton-Miller, 2011). Others contend that EO only influences non-family business performance (Madison, Runyan, & Swinney, 2014) or, conversely, that EO only influences family business performance (Lee & Chu, 2017). On the other hand, when EO is deconstructed into its dimensions, the effect of risk-taking, the most researched dimension, on family firm performance is negative (Naldi et al, 2007) or not significant (e.g., Stenholm, Pukkinen, & Heinonen, 2016).…”
Section: Consideration Of the Eo Construct Within The Research Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior empirical studies have present different research findings on the association between EO and firm performance and mainly focused on the association only for performance (Lee & Chu, ; Naldi et al, ; Pittino et al, ). Our objective in this article is to extend current understanding of whether FOB owner has an impact on EO the business.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past two decades, EO and family firms performance have been examined by researchers (Pittino, Barroso Martínez, Chirico, & Sanguino Galván, 2018;Lee & Chu, 2017;Naldi et al, 2007;Cruz et al, 2012), and they mainly built on agency and stewardship theories. Most agency theory scholars address the advantages of family governance as it reduces the conflict between owner and agencies if there is a close alignment between the interest of the two parties (Lee & Chu, 2017). Regarding EO, scholars (Zahra, 2005;Naldi et al, 2007;Riviezzo et al, 2015) pointed out the central role of family involvement in shaping strategic entrepreneurship.…”
Section: Eo and Family Business Ownermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baird & H. Thomas, 1985) that differs by a firm's stage of development. We therefore propose hypothesis 3 (H3) as follows: H3: There is a positive relationship between risk-taking and entrepreneurial orientation  Relationship between entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and firm performance The second construct firms' performance suggest that entrepreneurial orientation leads firms into being successful in the market place through growth in market share, profit and sales revenue (T. Lee & Chu, 2017). Empirical findings show a positive relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance and sales growth (Zahra, 1991;S.…”
Section: Conceptual Model and Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%