2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between endangered thick-shelled river mussel (Unio crassus) and its host fishes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
67
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
67
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Host fish testing has been conducted using various methods to determine suitable fish for specific freshwater mussels and understand the host–parasite relationship (Zale & Neves, ; Allen et al ., ; Douda, Horký & Bílý, ; Lima et al ., ; Taeubert, Gum & Geist, , ; Taeubert et al ., ). It is recognised that laboratory methods do not replicate natural processes; however, it is a first step to understanding what may happen naturally in a controlled setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Host fish testing has been conducted using various methods to determine suitable fish for specific freshwater mussels and understand the host–parasite relationship (Zale & Neves, ; Allen et al ., ; Douda, Horký & Bílý, ; Lima et al ., ; Taeubert, Gum & Geist, , ; Taeubert et al ., ). It is recognised that laboratory methods do not replicate natural processes; however, it is a first step to understanding what may happen naturally in a controlled setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taeubert et al (2012) also recorded the occurrence of bitterlings in streams with large populations of U. crassus, although they did not report on the reproductive relationship. Doubtless, over time, the habitats now occupied (in terms of mussels) only by U. crassus will be invaded by the bitterling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mass‐exposure in 70 L of still water) was used in all experimental infections mentioned throughout the paper. Though individual exposure is sometimes recommended (Douda, and references therein), simultaneous exposure of the group of fish is commonly used in experimental parasitological practice (e.g., Gopko, Mikheev, & Taskinen, , ; Seppälä, Karvonen, & Valtonen, ; Seppälä et al., ; Taeubert, Gum, & Geist, ; Taeubert, Martinez, Gum, & Geist, ). Such “mass‐exposure” approach is especially logical when studying fish, which spend a substantial amount of time in shoals (Taeubert et al., ) as juvenile salmonids do (Brännäs, Jonsson, & Lundqvist, ; Hicks & Watson, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Taeubert et al. (, ) five fish from each tank were sacrificed randomly 3 days postexposure to check for infection success. We found successful infection (ranging from 19 to 782 glochidia per fish with mean ± SD = 313.0 ± 239.3) in glochidia exposed fish, while fish from the control group had no glochidia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%