2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship Between EF and Strain Permits a More Accurate Assessment of LV Systolic Function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
28
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Feature-tracking techniques enable the assessment of myocardial deformation imaging as strain. Myocardial strain is a more robust tool to detect systolic dysfunction than ejection fraction (EF), in particular in the presence of LV-hypertrophy (21,22). Use of the sphericity index (SI) has been an effort to simply assess LV shape and function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feature-tracking techniques enable the assessment of myocardial deformation imaging as strain. Myocardial strain is a more robust tool to detect systolic dysfunction than ejection fraction (EF), in particular in the presence of LV-hypertrophy (21,22). Use of the sphericity index (SI) has been an effort to simply assess LV shape and function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding is also in alignment with previous studies, which showed that both GLS and GCS are robust to LV volume changes, especially more robust compared with LVEF. 11,18,20 Latest works support the idea that myocardial shortening is a superior parameter for myocardial contraction and function. 21 Similar to our analysis, other studies have also shown that septal contraction is 892 D. Hashemi et al primarily impaired-even though in different cardiac diseases leading to HF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Strain imaging provides the opportunity to render the spatial contractility parameters (longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain) measurable at each voxel level over the cardiac cycle, as the LVEF is limited in discriminating HF patients and both global longitudinal and circumferential strain provide the chance to assess these subjects more accurately-especially by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). 11 Since HFmrEF was just introduced in 2016 by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines, assessment of strain imaging in HFmrEF patients has been very limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A standard method of assessing the systolic function of the heart is, regarding its global functionquantitative assessment of the left ventricular systolic fraction, and regarding its regional function-qualitative, visual assessment of contractility of particular myocardial segments. Over the last few years, considering limitations of standard methods to assess left ventricular systolic function, a more precise method of assessment has been proposed, namely quantitative analysis of left ventricular myocardial strain [9,10]. Initially, methods of echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular myocardial strain were developed [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%