1994
DOI: 10.1080/00221325.1994.9914767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship Between Curiosity and Cognitive Ability in Third- and Fifth-Grade Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Naylor () found trait curiosity to be slightly correlated with verbal ability, but not with numerical ability. Positive correlations between fluid intelligence have also been reported for peer ratings of curiosity (Maw & Maw, ) and for samples with children (Alberti & Witryol, ). It can be hypothesized that the relationship between the two variables is due to a direct influence of fluid intelligence on the development of curiosity (Moutafi, Furnham, & Crump, ).…”
Section: Nomological Networkmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Naylor () found trait curiosity to be slightly correlated with verbal ability, but not with numerical ability. Positive correlations between fluid intelligence have also been reported for peer ratings of curiosity (Maw & Maw, ) and for samples with children (Alberti & Witryol, ). It can be hypothesized that the relationship between the two variables is due to a direct influence of fluid intelligence on the development of curiosity (Moutafi, Furnham, & Crump, ).…”
Section: Nomological Networkmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…More sociable and more active children are more likely to be infected (Kvalsvig & Becker 1988). It is possible that cognitive function is also linked with risk of exposure (for example there is a moderate relationship between curiosity and cognitive function (Alberti & Witryol 1994)) and that this positive correlation could cancel out the negative relationship between infection level and cognitive function at low levels of infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his studies, Witryol et al measured children's choice of both novelty and complexity under different levels of familiarity (Wentworth & Witryol, 1990;Cahill-Solis & Witryol, 1994;Alberti & Witryol, 1994). In a study investigating the relationship between curiosity and cognitive ability, Alberti and Witryol (1994) administered a behavioral measure of curiosity to 3 rd and 5 th grade children and collected data on their cognitive ability.…”
Section: Preference For Complexity/unknown As Measure Of Curiositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his studies, Witryol et al measured children's choice of both novelty and complexity under different levels of familiarity (Wentworth & Witryol, 1990;Cahill-Solis & Witryol, 1994;Alberti & Witryol, 1994). In a study investigating the relationship between curiosity and cognitive ability, Alberti and Witryol (1994) administered a behavioral measure of curiosity to 3 rd and 5 th grade children and collected data on their cognitive ability. Curiosity was measured using a binary choice preference test of stimuli between a novel option and a familiar option, with the added feature that there were four different levels of familiarity --from high familiarity to high novelty --induced by using four different familiarization sequences .…”
Section: Preference For Complexity/unknown As Measure Of Curiositymentioning
confidence: 99%