2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0346-251x(02)00014-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between cooperative learning, perception of social support, and academic achievement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
49
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…They had been created ad hoc and had not been validated in the theoretical structure through confirmatory factor analysis (Bay & Çetin, 2012;García et al, 2012;Ghaith, 2002;Ibarra & Rodríguez, 2007;.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They had been created ad hoc and had not been validated in the theoretical structure through confirmatory factor analysis (Bay & Çetin, 2012;García et al, 2012;Ghaith, 2002;Ibarra & Rodríguez, 2007;.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it did not include significant dimensions such as group reflection, interaction or social skills. Although these instru-ments were designed for a non-university sample, Ghaith (2002) used the second version of the CLI with university students, but his research failed to provide information about reliability and validity of the instrument.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El aprendizaje cooperativo lleva consigo que el alumnado trabaje junto con el fin de lograr una meta común; trabajar con otras personas conlleva la adquisición de competencias emocionales en general y sociales en particular, como por ejemplo la resolución de conflictos o el liderazgo. En este sentido una metodología cooperativa ofrece la oportunidad de crear un buen clima en el aula al respetar las distintas opiniones del alumnado y fomentar en todo momento la interacción (Ghaith, 2002;Johnson & Johnson, 1989;Johnson & Johnson, 2009b;Johnson, Johnson & Smith, 2007;Slavin, 1989;Tsay & Brady, 2010;Wang, 2009). …”
Section: Marco Teóricounclassified
“…Second, numerous studies have investigated and compared this instructional strategy with others. Most indicate that STAD is more prominent and advantageous in terms of generalization, breadth, and application (Armstrong & Palmer, 1998;Ghaith, 2002). More importantly, most teachers, even the writer who is also a teacher, regard STAD as a highly applicable teaching method, handy and consistent with teaching philosophies and practices (Hertz-Lazarowitz, & Miller, 1995).…”
Section: Theory Conceptual Framework and Current Debates On Stadmentioning
confidence: 99%