1990
DOI: 10.1016/0109-5641(90)90022-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between contact angles of die stone on elastomeric impression materials and voids in stone casts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
20
1
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
20
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies also suggested that there is a strong negative correlation between mean contact angles and the ability of the impression material to be poured with dental stone without air bubble entrapment. Other studies 18,19 also reported better wetting ability of the hydrophilic poly(vinyl siloxanes), when compared with that of the hydrophobic ones; however, the contact angle values of these materials were significantly higher than those of polyether. 18 In all published research, hydrophilicity of the impression materials before setting was tested by the number of voids in the impression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies also suggested that there is a strong negative correlation between mean contact angles and the ability of the impression material to be poured with dental stone without air bubble entrapment. Other studies 18,19 also reported better wetting ability of the hydrophilic poly(vinyl siloxanes), when compared with that of the hydrophobic ones; however, the contact angle values of these materials were significantly higher than those of polyether. 18 In all published research, hydrophilicity of the impression materials before setting was tested by the number of voids in the impression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Other studies 18,19 also reported better wetting ability of the hydrophilic poly(vinyl siloxanes), when compared with that of the hydrophobic ones; however, the contact angle values of these materials were significantly higher than those of polyether. 18 In all published research, hydrophilicity of the impression materials before setting was tested by the number of voids in the impression. In most of the studies the authors used dies, 13,15,16,19 flat dentin surfaces (with or without grooves), 4,20 or plastic teeth, 14 while the primary method of mixing was by hand spatulation after dispensing equal lengths of base and catalyst; however, mode of mixing seems to be an important factor, as it has been shown that automixing produces significantly fewer voids than hand mixing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The increased wettability of these products has been attributed to the incorporation of surface-active substances to the formula, increasing the affinity of the liquid phase of the plaster mix for the impression surfaces [6,7]. The surface-activated silicone impression materials exhibit greater wettability than non-activated materials [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incompatibility of impression materials and the disinfectants may affect the accuracy, texture, dimensional stability, hardness, and other important aspects of the casts which are the deciding factors of an excellent prosthesis. 31 Moreover, the method used should not be messy and tedious as impressions are an integral part of our daily practice. Hence, it is essential to choose a method, i.e., ideal for the impression material to be disinfected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%