1986
DOI: 10.1016/0022-474x(86)90024-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between concentration and time in the toxicity of phosphine to adults of a resistant strain of Tribolium castaneum (Herbst)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
1
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
31
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…PH 3 was generated in a collection tube containing aluminium phosphide introduced into a solution of sulphuric acid (5%). PH 3 concentration was determined with gas chromatography using a thermal conductivity detector with nitrogen (N 2 ) as the standard (Winks and Waterford, 1986).…”
Section: Fumigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PH 3 was generated in a collection tube containing aluminium phosphide introduced into a solution of sulphuric acid (5%). PH 3 concentration was determined with gas chromatography using a thermal conductivity detector with nitrogen (N 2 ) as the standard (Winks and Waterford, 1986).…”
Section: Fumigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we cannot yet make any salient suggestions on choice of exposure method for these types of compounds. Testing for resistance to fumigants also poses special problems, as discussed by Winks (1986a,b) and Winks and Waterford (1986).…”
Section: Choice Of Exposure Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Purity of phosphine was determined by a Clarus ® 580 gas chromatograph (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA) using a thermal conductivity detector with nitrogen as the standard (Winks and Waterford, 1986). Mortality response to phosphine of the tested strains was measured against a range of phosphine concentrations i.e.…”
Section: Insect Response To Phosphinementioning
confidence: 99%