2005
DOI: 10.1080/14635240.2005.10708048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between coaching and workplace stress: A correlational study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of the research examining well-being has been positive [ 52 54 , 57 ], although Yu et al [ 56 ] found that coaching only resulted in one subscale change in well-being as measured by the scales of psychological well-being and only resulted in a change in positive affect as measured by the Positive Affect Negative Affect Scale. The results for depression have been mixed with some studies finding results that support [ 31 ] or partially support [ 52 ] the impact of coaching on improving depression whereas others found that this relationship is not supported [ 57 59 ]. The studies examining improvements in stress have been more positive than those for depression with most of the studies finding a reduction in stress linked to coaching [ 45 , 53 , 57 ], one found partial support [ 52 ] and only a handful found no significant changes [ 31 , 58 , 59 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the research examining well-being has been positive [ 52 54 , 57 ], although Yu et al [ 56 ] found that coaching only resulted in one subscale change in well-being as measured by the scales of psychological well-being and only resulted in a change in positive affect as measured by the Positive Affect Negative Affect Scale. The results for depression have been mixed with some studies finding results that support [ 31 ] or partially support [ 52 ] the impact of coaching on improving depression whereas others found that this relationship is not supported [ 57 59 ]. The studies examining improvements in stress have been more positive than those for depression with most of the studies finding a reduction in stress linked to coaching [ 45 , 53 , 57 ], one found partial support [ 52 ] and only a handful found no significant changes [ 31 , 58 , 59 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively there may be a discrepancy between actual, or perceived, and reported psychosocial hazard, with academics reporting inflated exposures. However, neither of these explanations satisfactorily accommodates previous claims that the Indicator Tool has been associated with stress (Gyllensten and Palmer, 2005;Bevan et al, 2010) (Kerr et al, 2009). A final explanation, provided by the inter-individuality of the physiology underlying the stress response, may therefore be more plausible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Wilson and Wilson (2013) argued that there are various causes of stress in an employment such as workplace environment, role in the organization, career development, interpersonal relationships at work, organizational structure and climate, as well as individual factors. Meanwhile, Gyllensten and Palmer (2005) stated that there are three main factors that often lead to high levels of stress at work, i.e. role ambiguity, role conflicts and overloaded tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%