The relationship between characteristics of context and research utilization in a pediatric setting

Abstract

BackgroundResearch utilization investigators have called for more focused examination of the influence of context on research utilization behaviors. Yet, up until recently, lack of instrumentation to identify and quantify aspects of organizational context that are integral to research use has significantly hampered these efforts. The Alberta Context Tool (ACT) was developed to assess the relationships between organizational factors and research utilization by a variety of healthcare professional groups. The purpose of this paper is to present findings from a pilot study using the ACT to elicit pediatric and neonatal healthcare professionals' perceptions of the organizational context in which they work and their use of research to inform practice. Specifically, we report on the relationship between dimensions of context, founded on the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework, and self-reported research use behavior.MethodsA cross-sectional survey approach was employed using a version of the ACT, modified specifically for pediatric settings. The survey was administered to nurses working in three pediatric units in Alberta, Canada. Scores for three dimensions of context (culture, leadership and evaluation) were used to categorize respondent data into one of four context groups (high, moderately high, moderately low and low). We then examined the relationships between nurses' self-reported research use and their perceived context.ResultsA 69% response rate was achieved. Statistically significant differences in nurses' perceptions of culture, leadership and evaluation, and self-reported conceptual research use were found across the three units. Differences in instrumental research use across the three groups of nurses by unit were not significant. Higher self-reported instrumental and conceptual research use by all nurses in the sample was associated with more positive perceptions of their context.ConclusionsOverall, the results of this study lend support to the view that more positive contexts are associated with higher reports of research use in practice. These findings have implications for organizational endeavors to promote evidence-informed practice and maximize the quality of care. Importantly, these findings can be used to guide the development of interventions to target modifiable characteristics of organizational context that are influential in shaping research use behavior.

Counselor and Client Perspectives of Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Children in Zambia: A Qualitative Study

“…This feedback is supported by literature reinforcing the need for support at various organizational levels (e.g., service organization, greater health systems) for effective implementation of EBT (Cummings, Estabrooks, Midodzi, Wallin & Hayduk, 2007; Greenhalgh, Robert, Bate, Macfarlane & Kyriakidou, 2005; Schoenwald et al, 2008). More research is warranted on the multiple aspects of implementing EBTs in LMIC, including organizational outcomes.…”

Knowledge Translation Efforts in Child and Youth Mental Health: A Systematic Review

“…Early research made little concession to the influence of context, including the historical and socio-cultural contexts that facilitated early diffusion research. We are now more aware that what is adopted and effectively used at Site A, for instance, may not be readily adopted and effective at Site B, and that organization and individual readiness for change and related contextual factors play an important role (Cummings, Hutchinson, Scott, Norton, & Estabrooks, 2010). A new wave of practice-based implementation research is already underway.…”

The role of organizational context in moderating the effect of research use on pain outcomes in hospitalized children: a cross sectional study

“…Most investigations have traditionally focused on individual provider factors and behaviours in decision making to enhance patient outcomes [6]. While individual factors have been closely associated with nurses’ success in implementing research into practice, many barriers exist [7]. There is now growing evidence that organizational context may have a greater impact on successful implementation of research evidence compared to individual healthcare professional factors [8, 9].…”