2013
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01426.2012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between brain cortical activity and brain oxygenation in the prefrontal cortex during hypergravity exposure

Abstract: Artificial gravity has been proposed as a method to counteract the physiological deconditioning of long-duration spaceflight; however, the effects of hypergravity on the central nervous system has had little study. The study aims to investigate whether there is a relationship between prefrontal cortex brain activity and prefrontal cortex oxygenation during exposure to hypergravity. Twelve healthy participants were selected to undergo hypergravity exposure aboard a short-arm human centrifuge. Participants were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(24 reference statements)
2
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To achieve statistical significance, this analysis yielded an estimated number of participants equal to 12. This value is compatible with previous studies in which cognitive functions and hemodynamic parameters were assessed during varying gravitational loading (White et al 2005, 2012, 2018; Smith et al 2013; Schneider et al 2014; Goswami et al 2015a, b; Evans et al 2015; Barbiero et al 2017; Verma et al 2018) ( N  = 6 to 20). We nevertheless decided to apply a safety margin to these values and recruited 19 participants.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To achieve statistical significance, this analysis yielded an estimated number of participants equal to 12. This value is compatible with previous studies in which cognitive functions and hemodynamic parameters were assessed during varying gravitational loading (White et al 2005, 2012, 2018; Smith et al 2013; Schneider et al 2014; Goswami et al 2015a, b; Evans et al 2015; Barbiero et al 2017; Verma et al 2018) ( N  = 6 to 20). We nevertheless decided to apply a safety margin to these values and recruited 19 participants.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Using resting state fMRI and EEG, AG has been shown to alter cerebellar, sensorimotor and vestibular brain regions (Indovina et al 2005; Cheron et al 2014; Cebolla et al 2016; Rousseau et al 2016; Van Ombergen et al 2017). Furthermore, the relationship between brain cortical activity and brain oxygenation in the prefrontal cortex during hypergravity exposure has also been studied (Smith et al 2013). Specifically, sex-specific changes in cortical activation patterns during exposure to AG have also been reported using EEG (Schneider et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scalability and reduction in the hardware size might also be relevant to make fNIRS devices not only portable but also wireless, allowing for an even more naturalistic data acquisition. Finally, further research to quantify the impact of other factors and components on fNIRS signals as expected in open environment scenarios, e.g., blood pressure (Kirilina et al, 2012), respiratory changes (Scholkmann et al, 2013) and gravitational pulling (Smith et al, 1985), seems to be important to achieve a solid understanding of the obtained results. This knowledge would be essential to enable reliable fNIRS experiments in extreme unconstrained applications, e.g., bungee jumping or skydiving.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The onset of the movement was defined as the time when the differential waveform of EMG was over the three-sigma limits. Outlier trials were excluded from analysis according to the following steps: (1) we determined a threshold for the artifact as ± 60 μV; (2) the epochs where EEG signals of more than 3 electrodes exceeded the threshold before movement onset were selected; (3) the selected trial that was also visually recognised as an outlier by the experimenter was excluded from the further analysis 43 44 . Consequently, the number of trials submitted to the analyses per participant was 30.6 ± 3.9 (mean ± s.d.).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%