2018
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijafrm.20180303.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship Between Board Size and CEO Duality and Firm Performance: Evidence from Jordan

Abstract: This study investigates the relationship between board of directors' characteristics namely (board size and CEO duality) and firm performance among Jordanian listed firms. Firm performance is measured using return on assets (ROA). Due to limited studies regarding corporate governance practices and firm performance has been done in developing countries like Jordan. Importantly, these studies have also been limited in their scope due to restricted and particularized focus on factors hindering firm performance in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of directors in the company is used to compute the Board of director's size, which is a key measure of its performance. The board of director's ability to provide appropriate support in decreasing agency costs that emerge from the company's ineffective management is expected to increase with its size, which will ultimately improve financial performance (Qadorah & Fadzil, 2018). As employees are less likely to function when the board size exceeds that, it becomes harder for the CEO to exert control.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of directors in the company is used to compute the Board of director's size, which is a key measure of its performance. The board of director's ability to provide appropriate support in decreasing agency costs that emerge from the company's ineffective management is expected to increase with its size, which will ultimately improve financial performance (Qadorah & Fadzil, 2018). As employees are less likely to function when the board size exceeds that, it becomes harder for the CEO to exert control.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This communicates that the CEODU in Indian public banks should not be encouraged and needs necessary checks on CEODU decision-making, therefore, for Indian public banks, the analysis leads to accepting the null hypothesis (H1) which supports the outlook of the agency theory and outraced the concepts of stewardship theory, in terms of CEODU. Thus, the relationship is in line with Goyal and Park (2002), Hsu and Chen (2020), Qadorah et al (2018) and Shivdasani and Zenner (2004). The negative impact of CEODU implies that in an emerging economy where the institutional legal framework is weak, the CEO sharing a dual position focuses on their own goals over the common goal of protecting and benefiting the…”
Section: Panel Data Regression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This change initiates the debate about whether such separation on the corporate board is reflected in improved business performance. Although the findings of prior studies are mixed, few studies documented an inverse impact of CEODU on performance, (Duru et al, 2016;Hsu and Chen, 2020;Qadorah et al, 2018), while other studies advocate the fact that CEODU brought better results (Chang et al, 2019;Ozbek and Boyd, 2020). Such differences in results can be related to differences in the data sample set, choice of economy or nation, sample time period or performance indicator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The board of managements, the leading authority concerned with manager monitoring, is appointed by the shareholders and acts on their behalf to monitor the managers' decisionmaking activities to ensure their good faith and their shareholder value creation attitude (Qadorah and Fadzil, 2018). Directors participate in the business's economic life and have the responsibility of accountability to monitor the managers' actions and rectification (Jizi, 2017).…”
Section: Board Of Directorsmentioning
confidence: 99%