2018
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiy471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship Between Blood Sample Volume and Diagnostic Sensitivity of Blood Culture for Typhoid and Paratyphoid Fever: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: BackgroundBlood culture is the standard diagnostic method for typhoid and paratyphoid (enteric) fever in surveillance studies and clinical trials, but sensitivity is widely acknowledged to be suboptimal. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine sources of heterogeneity across studies and quantified the effect of blood volume.MethodsWe searched the literature to identify all studies that performed blood culture alongside bone marrow culture (a gold standard) to detect cases of enteric fever… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
77
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
77
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Missed cases can occur when patients with fever do not seek medical care, attend a clinic that is not part of the study surveillance programme, or seek medical care but do not receive a blood culture test required for diagnosis. In addition, blood culture tests have poor sensitivity [3], especially in settings where self-treatment with widely available antibiotics may occur prior to blood culture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Missed cases can occur when patients with fever do not seek medical care, attend a clinic that is not part of the study surveillance programme, or seek medical care but do not receive a blood culture test required for diagnosis. In addition, blood culture tests have poor sensitivity [3], especially in settings where self-treatment with widely available antibiotics may occur prior to blood culture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4] As a minimum, crude incidence estimates are often adjusted for the poor sensitivity of blood culture tests; [5] among those with typhoid fever, only around 60% of individuals who receive a blood culture are expected to test positive. [3] Additionally, incidence can be adjusted to account for missed cases using inflation factors based on data from community surveys or other sources of information on health-care seeking behaviour. [6,7] However, incidence estimates also need to be adjusted for the number of patients who have typhoid fever meeting pre-specified eligibility criteria and attend a surveillance facility but do not receive a blood culture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One contributing factor to uncertainty about the burden of disease is the lack of reliable diagnostic testing. The most consistently valid method for laboratory diagnosis is blood culture, estimated to be only 61% sensitive [ 7 ] in a recent meta-analysis, and may be dependent on sample volume [ 8 ]. In many low- and middle-income countries, blood culture is also largely unavailable, particularly in rural areas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latent class model indicates 73% sensitivity in the overall population (74% in children aged less than 17 years), in the high range of reported estimates. 10 However, in the absence of a secondary endpoint test to confirm PCR results, there is a non-neglectable risk of class membership misclassification (confirmed/suspected) in addition to the unbalanced weight of the respective tests. This might be counterbalanced by running the model with results from bone marrow culture and/or serological test results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 In current clinical practice in most endemic countries, blood culture and Widal test are the most common diagnostic procedures used despite poor sensitivity and specificity. 9 Indeed, blood culture sensitivity has been estimated at 59% of presumptive cases, ranging from 51% to 65% according to specimen volume, 10 whereas Widal test is hampered by the lack of standardization of reagents and/or misuse and misinterpretation of results. 11,12 Serological rapid diagnostic tests such as Typhidot-M or Tubex may represent some improvement over the Widal test, but still have suboptimal sensitivity and specificity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%