2006
DOI: 10.1375/183242706776382365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relationship Between Birthweight Discordance and Perinatal Mortality of One of the Twins in a Twin Pair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The twinning rate per 1000 births was 6.4 in 1951 and increased to 9.9 in 2001 (Imaizumi, 2003). The mortality rate of twin infants is higher than that of singleton infants (Imaizumi, 2001;Kato & Matsuda, 2006), and morbidity associated with multiple births including twinning is an important public health problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The twinning rate per 1000 births was 6.4 in 1951 and increased to 9.9 in 2001 (Imaizumi, 2003). The mortality rate of twin infants is higher than that of singleton infants (Imaizumi, 2001;Kato & Matsuda, 2006), and morbidity associated with multiple births including twinning is an important public health problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now well accepted that fetal birthweight discordance is a risk factor for adverse outcomes in multiple pregnancy, even when the smaller fetus is appropriately grown for gestational age . In the past, a discordance of 20% to 25% was arbitrarily used as being clinically significant, but it now appears that a lower threshold of greater than 18% is associated with increased perinatal risks.…”
Section: New Possibilities Beyond Lga/macrosomiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BWD is a risk factor for perinatal mortality in the USA (Branum & Schoendorf, 2003;Kim et al, 2019), Japan (Kato & Matsuda, 2006) and Canada (Jahanfar et al, 2017). It is also a risk factor for neonatal mortality (Branum & Schoendorf, 2003;Demissie et al, 2002;Kim et al, 2019;Mazhar & Kanwal, 2010;Tobe et al, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%