Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1939
DOI: 10.1037/h0060530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relation of size of stimulus and intensity in the human eye: I. Intensity thresholds for white light.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
64
3
1

Year Published

1959
1959
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
64
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is equivalent to the average difference between foveal and peripheral luminance when the two targets are of equal brightness. As with the functions derived from magnitude estimations, the decibel separation can be seen to increase as the eccentricity of The filled symbols are threshold measurements: the circles are the averages of the thresholds measured in this study, the triangles are from Hecht, Haig , and Wald (1935), the diamonds from Graham. Brown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is equivalent to the average difference between foveal and peripheral luminance when the two targets are of equal brightness. As with the functions derived from magnitude estimations, the decibel separation can be seen to increase as the eccentricity of The filled symbols are threshold measurements: the circles are the averages of the thresholds measured in this study, the triangles are from Hecht, Haig , and Wald (1935), the diamonds from Graham. Brown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…5 measurements made by Hecht, Haig, and Wald (1935), Graham, Brown, and Mote (1939), and Zigler and Wolf (1958). The measurements by Zigler and Wolf have all been lowered by 10 dB, since their stimulus presentation was of brief (40 msec.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14). Hecht and Mintz, in line with the results emanating from Grahams' laboratory (Graham et al, 1939), recognized that the physical variable responsible for the detection threshold is not the height in the middle, but the light deficit integrated over the retinal summation zone, which extends for several minutes of arc in the fovea. The conceptual separation of optical spread and retinal summation in analyzing visual processing became paradigmatic for future research in this area.…”
Section: Fig 7 Relationship Between Retinal Location Of a Peripheramentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The relative contributions of elements is a power function of their distance from the center of the target with those elements at the center contributing the most and those farthest from the center the least. Kincaid, Blackwell, and Kristofferson (1960) have modified Graham et al's (1939) theory slightly. Instead of making the arbitrary assumption that the element contribution function obeys a power law they empirically derived the function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the earliest visual detection theories was formulated by Graham, Brown, and Mote (1939), The total area of detection target is considered to be composed of many unit elements of area with the contribution of each of these elements a function of their distance from the center of the target. The relative contributions of elements is a power function of their distance from the center of the target with those elements at the center contributing the most and those farthest from the center the least.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%