1997
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199701000-00018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relation of Clinical Saccadic Eye Movement Testing to Reading in Kindergartners and First Graders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Northway observed that the children who scored lower in the rate of reading test (RRT) took longer at the horizontal DEM test. Reading performance has also been significantly related to saccadic eye movements assessed using the NISOA K-D in 5-year-olds (p=0.0129) and 6-year-olds (p=0.0167) [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Northway observed that the children who scored lower in the rate of reading test (RRT) took longer at the horizontal DEM test. Reading performance has also been significantly related to saccadic eye movements assessed using the NISOA K-D in 5-year-olds (p=0.0129) and 6-year-olds (p=0.0167) [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Other authors have argued that control of eye movements is an important factor directly related to reading and other scholarly activities [3,4]. Saccadic eye movements have frequently been related to reading ability in several primary school grades [5,6]. Recently Bucci et al [3] found that in a word-reading task the total fixation period is significantly longer in dyslexics than in non-dyslexic children; and the coordination of saccades is poor in a dyslexic child compared to a non-dyslexic child.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They suggested that an increased time for reading was required to maintain accuracy in the presence of the induced hyperopia. 18,57 Ayton et al 34 reported that the DEM test is correlated with aspects of reading and visual processing performance, although it is not significantly correlated with quantitative measures of eye movements. These differences could also be attributed to the different reading assessment tools used in each study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Near visual acuity were estimated using the Bernell near visual acuity card at 33 cm (Bernell Corporation, Near PT Test Card/Child Recog/Playing Cards BC2207, South Bend, IN, USA; Brownlee and Goss, 1988; Kulp and Schmidt, 1997; Wong et al. , 2002; Lam et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%