2013
DOI: 10.1037/a0027255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relation between trauma exposure and prosocial behavior.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
98
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neuroticism was not associated with openness (r = À.04, p = .48), conscientiousness (r = À.001, p = .991), or agreeableness (r = .03, p = .596), whereas agreeableness, conscientiousness, and agreeableness were moderately correlated with one another: r oc = .36, p < .001, r oa = .38, p < .001, r ca = .32, p < .001. We used Brody and Ehrlichman's scale in this study because it has shown good psychometric properties in previous research (e.g., Frazier et al, 2013;Kashdan & Steger, 2007;Oishi, Krochik, Roth, & Sherman, 2012). In addition, it is a nice compromise between the longer, more comprehensive scales (e.g., 120-items) and the extremely brief scale, which has only one or two items for each Big Five trait.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Neuroticism was not associated with openness (r = À.04, p = .48), conscientiousness (r = À.001, p = .991), or agreeableness (r = .03, p = .596), whereas agreeableness, conscientiousness, and agreeableness were moderately correlated with one another: r oc = .36, p < .001, r oa = .38, p < .001, r ca = .32, p < .001. We used Brody and Ehrlichman's scale in this study because it has shown good psychometric properties in previous research (e.g., Frazier et al, 2013;Kashdan & Steger, 2007;Oishi, Krochik, Roth, & Sherman, 2012). In addition, it is a nice compromise between the longer, more comprehensive scales (e.g., 120-items) and the extremely brief scale, which has only one or two items for each Big Five trait.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, individuals who have great interest in helping others, a tendency to behave in a prosocial manner, and intentions to act courteously toward coworkers are relatively more likely to rate themselves as happier (Williams & Shiaw, 1999). Interestingly, a relationship between prosocial behavior and increased well-being has been found not just among psychologically healthy individuals (Thoits & Hewitt, 2001), but also among those who had experienced a recent traumatic event and were presumably in need of help themselves (Frazier et al, 2013).…”
Section: Prosocial Behavior and Well-beingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Recipients of prosocial behavior are less likely to use drugs, more likely to have stronger interpersonal relationships, and better able to recover from traumatic experiences (Carlo, Crockett, Wilkinson, & Beal, 2011;Frazier et al, 2012;Lambert & Fincham, 2011). Performers of prosocial behavior also experience relationship benefits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%