2012
DOI: 10.3923/jm.2012.32.40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relation Between the Surface Chemical Composition of Escherichia coli and their Electron Donor/Electron Acceptor (Acid-base) Properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, only E. coli strains 13, 76, EI3, EI2, and 65 were hydrophilic according to these approaches. These results showed similarities with those of Hamadi [ 9 , 12 ], who reported that E. coli strains isolated from patients with urinary tract infections are hydrophilic with both approaches.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, only E. coli strains 13, 76, EI3, EI2, and 65 were hydrophilic according to these approaches. These results showed similarities with those of Hamadi [ 9 , 12 ], who reported that E. coli strains isolated from patients with urinary tract infections are hydrophilic with both approaches.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…ese results showed similarities with those of Hamadi [9,12], who reported that E. coli strains isolated from patients with urinary tract infections are hydrophilic with both approaches.…”
Section: Ecoli Ei1 Ecoli 38 Ecol 64 Ecoli 19 Ecoli Em3 Ecoli Em4 Ecoli 13 Ecoli Ei3 Ecoli Ei4 Ecoli 76 Ecoli Ei2 Ecoli 65supporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The surface of the two varieties express an important electron donor character [high value of γ (-) ] Table 3. This may be due to the difference in the chemical composition of the two varieties studied, but no relationship has been etablished between the elemental composition, functional composition (expressed as a percentage), and the electron-donor character (Hamadi et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Such characteristics were expressed in terms of surface charge, hydrophobicity, and electron donor-acceptor properties of bacterial cell surface. These could influence the attractive and repulsive forces between cell and mucosal surfaces, therefore modulating the adhesion level (Hamadi et al 2012). In the meantime, the specific adhesion-receptor interaction is an essential mechanism of microbial adhesion on GI surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%