2021
DOI: 10.1177/00207314211051880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Relation Between Precarious Employment Arrangements and Social Precarity: Findings from the PREMIS Study in Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract: Precarious employment (PE) is a well-known social determinant of health and health inequalities. However, as most previous studies have focused on physical and mental well-being, less is known about the social-related outcomes (ie, social precarity) associated with precarious arrangements. This cross-sectional study aims to investigate whether PE is associated with social precarity in a working population of 401 nonstandard employed workers in Stockholm, Sweden (2016-2017). PE was assessed with the Swedish ver… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Irish state has been reluctant to govern home care services; however, that is not to say that regulation alone would guarantee better protection and conditions for care workers. The role of state regulation can be contradictory in that it can both improve worker protections and create precarity depending on context and the type of regulation that is implemented (Matilla-Santander et al ., 2022; Siegmann and Schiphorst, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Irish state has been reluctant to govern home care services; however, that is not to say that regulation alone would guarantee better protection and conditions for care workers. The role of state regulation can be contradictory in that it can both improve worker protections and create precarity depending on context and the type of regulation that is implemented (Matilla-Santander et al ., 2022; Siegmann and Schiphorst, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those in precarious employment are thus deprived of both the ‘temporal and economic resources needed to plan their lives’ (McGann et al, 2016: 774). Quantitative research has more recently begun to focus on the negative wellbeing impacts of temporal uncertainty (Felstead et al, 2020; Lee and Kawachi, 2021) and to explore the concept of ‘social precarity’, with Matilla-Santander et al (2021) demonstrating an association between precarious employment and inability to participate in social activities.…”
Section: Discussion: From Insecurity Uncertainty and Marginalisation ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research might also seek to include the household as an additional unit of analysis when investigating work-related mental health. This inclusion would be useful as adverse employment arrangements can have adverse spill-over consequences for individuals' lives that extend beyond the individual and beyond the workplace (Della Porta et al 2015;Matilla-Santander et al 2022;Quinlan and Bohle 2015).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%