1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf00976420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relation between nonclassroom contact with faculty and students' perceptions of instructional quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Tinto further suggests that faculty members, who represent the institution's rules and values, are especially determinant in students' adjustment to the institution. Empirical research has supported these claims by showing that informal contacts (outside the classroom) between college students and faculty have a positive impact on students' academic performance, satisfaction with college life, retention, and educational and career goals (Andrews et al, 1987;Lamport, 1993;Terenzini and Pascarella, 1980;Theophilides and Terenzini, 1981).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Tinto further suggests that faculty members, who represent the institution's rules and values, are especially determinant in students' adjustment to the institution. Empirical research has supported these claims by showing that informal contacts (outside the classroom) between college students and faculty have a positive impact on students' academic performance, satisfaction with college life, retention, and educational and career goals (Andrews et al, 1987;Lamport, 1993;Terenzini and Pascarella, 1980;Theophilides and Terenzini, 1981).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Studies that have examined relationships between mentoring and individual differences such as cognitive styles, personality, locus of control, learning goal orientation, and mentoring (Armstrong, Allinson, & Hayes, 2002;Ellinger, 2002;Godshalk, & Sosik, 2003;Judge & Kammeyer-Mueller, 2007;Kim & Kim, 2007;Siegel, Smith, & Mosca, 2001) definitely suggest that interpersonal interactions and relationship between the participants are critical to mentoring. Particularly, studies that identified correlations between mentor personality and functions of mentoring and outcomes of mentoring (Chang, 1981;Theophilides & Terenzini, 1981;Wilson, Woods, & Gaff, 1974) and protégé personality and functions of mentoring and outcomes of mentoring (Aryee, Lo, & Kang, 1999;Turban & Dougherty, 1994) are important in the context of this study because mentoring is a relationship or interpersonal process where personalities play a part. However, it is not clear how the individual's basic orientation towards developing relationships as defined by attachment styles plays a role in the emergence of close interpersonal relationships like mentoring.…”
Section: Background Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of this control system or secure base and its connections with internal working models (environmental homeostasis) are regarded as primary features of personality functioning all through life (Bowlby, 1988). Personality is related to a person's behavior in mentoring relationships in terms of open communication, extraversion, agreeableness, flexibility (Engstrom, 2004;Theophilides & Terenzini, 1981;Turban & Dougherty, 1994), accessibility and availability (Wilson, Woods, & Gaff, 1974), and empathy and respect (Chang, 1981). The obvious overarching linkage between attachment styles and personality functioning in terms of well-being, trust, sociability, endurance, anxiety, and satisfaction with social support (Bowlby, 1988;Caldwell, 1994), therefore, makes it natural that early life social experiences could play a significant role in adult mentoring relationships (Scandura & Pellegrini, 2004).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations