2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2012.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relation between interaction aesthetics and affordances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later on, from 300 to 750 ms, affordance and attractiveness are jointly related in their neural responses and are strengthened by each other. In line with the design perspective suggesting that esthetically pleasing objects are considered to be more effective (Chawda et al, 2005;Norman, 2003;Tractinsky, 1997;Tractinsky et al, 2000;Xenakis and Arnellos, 2013) our findings stress the important additive interplay of attractiveness and affordance in the cognitive processing of tools. However, the present results highlight a key role played by affordance in the early stage of processing (P200) suggesting that the detection of the motoric and functional attributes of tools is the first step of tools evaluation, since it occurs before esthetic evaluation which exerts an additive effect only from 300 ms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Later on, from 300 to 750 ms, affordance and attractiveness are jointly related in their neural responses and are strengthened by each other. In line with the design perspective suggesting that esthetically pleasing objects are considered to be more effective (Chawda et al, 2005;Norman, 2003;Tractinsky, 1997;Tractinsky et al, 2000;Xenakis and Arnellos, 2013) our findings stress the important additive interplay of attractiveness and affordance in the cognitive processing of tools. However, the present results highlight a key role played by affordance in the early stage of processing (P200) suggesting that the detection of the motoric and functional attributes of tools is the first step of tools evaluation, since it occurs before esthetic evaluation which exerts an additive effect only from 300 ms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…If it is true that the esthetic value allows users to enhance the detection of action possibilities and, consequently, the detection of motor affordance (Xenakis and Arnellos, 2013), then it becomes crucial to explore the different cognitive operations involved in artifact evaluation as a function of both esthetic and affordance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This group of structures originally came to being for practical reasons of safety and sufficient in the sense of security of their dwellers, meaning this was a utilitarian inception of the idea, which later underwent all sorts of transformations [2]. In this context of utilitarity, that is affordances and achieved effect far beyond the original meaning [11]. The historical examples of the structures achieving the hovering illusion can be rarely encountered in an architecture where the prevailing building material was stone or brick, which is the case in the history of the European civilization since ancient times until the 19 th century.…”
Section: Introduction -Human Primordial Desire To Fly (Hover)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a consciousness has been termed "interaction aesthetics" (Xenakis & Arnellos, 2013). The e-learning platform can simultaneously capture the images, record the thinking and making processes, as well as identify new learning events as they appear during this image creation phases.…”
Section: Ppi: Doing and Reflectingmentioning
confidence: 99%