1956
DOI: 10.1007/bf02289132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relation between information and variance analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a good discussion of multivariate information concepts see McGill (1954) and Garner and McGill (1956).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a good discussion of multivariate information concepts see McGill (1954) and Garner and McGill (1956).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is very important to realize that the mere identification of association does not provide grounds to establish causality. Garner and McGill [3] showed that information analysis is very similar to analysis of variance. One may then extend the argument of Liebetrau [11] to information-theoretic measures.…”
Section: Measuring Attribute Importancementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since McGill (1954), zero quantities of Q have been interpreted as the absence of interactions (Garner and McGill 1956;Garner 1962;Matsuda 2000;Bell 2003;Jakulin 2005;Yeung 2008;Lucio-Arias and Leydesdorff 2009). This claim is demonstrably false.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without examining the strange behaviour of Q vis-à-vis the probability distributions to which it responds, Leydesdorff (2009), relying on Garner and McGill's (1956) observation of parallels between their accounting information for information and the analysis of variance, concludes that 'the Q-measure is mathematically sound but an interpretation from the perspective of information theory needs to be provided'. He then cites Jakulin (2005) who called, following a suggestion by Gat (1999), positive Qs measures of synergy and negative Qs measures of redundancy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%