2018
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.25648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The regulatory interplay between Oct-1 isoforms contributes to hematopoiesis and the isoforms imbalance correlates with a malignant transformation of B cells

Abstract: Oct-1(POU2F1) is a DNA-binding transcription regulator and its level being highly increased in many human cancers. Oct-1 is present in the human cells as a family of functionally different isoforms which are transcribed from alternative promoters. Here, we have demonstrated that expression patterns of Oct-1 isoforms change during differentiation of hematopoetic progenitor cells (CD34+) (HPCs) to the B (CD19+) and T (CD3+) cells. While Oct-1L is expressed at a high level in the CD34+ HPCs, its expression level … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S5). A well-established mechanism for transcriptional control in the POU family occurs when different family members or alternatively-spliced forms compete for the same binding site (53,60); in this regard, although we did not detect over-representation of the POU2F2 (Oct-2) motif near the RBP-J peaks, Oct-2 has previously been shown to inhibit auto-activation of Rta by preventing binding of Oct-1 and Rta to the Rta promoter (61). However, we think it is unlikely that Oct-1 regulates the reactivation switch independently because its expression is undetectable during latency and is only induced during reactivation, and ectopic Oct-1 siRNAs did not reactivate latent virus (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S5). A well-established mechanism for transcriptional control in the POU family occurs when different family members or alternatively-spliced forms compete for the same binding site (53,60); in this regard, although we did not detect over-representation of the POU2F2 (Oct-2) motif near the RBP-J peaks, Oct-2 has previously been shown to inhibit auto-activation of Rta by preventing binding of Oct-1 and Rta to the Rta promoter (61). However, we think it is unlikely that Oct-1 regulates the reactivation switch independently because its expression is undetectable during latency and is only induced during reactivation, and ectopic Oct-1 siRNAs did not reactivate latent virus (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, similar opposing roles were recently described for the Drosophila Oct1 ortholog, Nubbin, based on its different isoforms [60]. Different mammalian Oct1 isoforms have been described [61, 62], and thus Oct1 may regulate normal and malignant epithelial tissue states through evolutionarily conserved mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The ability of Oct-1 to regulate a wide range of functionally different genes and processes is based on its ability to interact with various DNA sites [5] and undergo multiple posttranslational modifications. Oct-1 isoforms differing in the sequence of the N-terminal domain are transcribed from alternative promoters and regulate a large number of target genes, both individual for each isoform and common for all Oct-1 isoforms [4,[6][7][8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oct-1 isoforms are expressed in normal cells at certain ratios that are relatively stable for certain cell types [ 4 , 7 , 8 ]. Disturbance in the expression level of some Oct-1 isoforms is observed in many types of tumor tissues and is associated with dysregulation of alternative promoters of the POU2F1 ( Oct-1 ) gene in tumor cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation