The Regulation of Religious Affairs in Taiwan: From State Control toLaisser-faire?

Abstract

This article looks at Taiwan's policy towards religion to show that non-Western societies can also achieve what Alfred Stepan called a “twin toleration” wherein the state does not intervene in religious affairs, and religion does not seek to control the state. The paper shows the sets of constraints in which policy-makers struggling for an adequate way to deal with religion operate. They have to choose among a variety of models in democratic societies, to take into account the legacy of the authoritarian era, and to consider the specificities of Taiwan's situation, influenced by a Chinese cultural heritage, Japanese colonialism and observations from other parts of the world. The paper then describes how these constraints have influenced the major stages in the evolution of relations between state and religions in Taiwanese society and then argue that the state had yet to reach a consensus up until 2008 on the legislation of religion because of disagreements between different religious actors.

Orders of Hunger and Heaven: Neoliberalism, Christian Charity and Homelessness in Taiwan

“…The lifting of martial law in 1987 represented an end to government regulation of religion, which remains largely unregulated today (Laliberte 2009). Even though suspicion of the close relation between religion and the profit motive has brought greater calls for government intervention (Kastner 2015), the Taiwanese government is reluctant to pass laws placing restrictions on religious groups (Laliberte 2009). As a consequence, a robust "religious market" has emerged (Lu et al 2008).…”

Rethinking Society for the 21st Century

“…This included freedom of religion, freedom of the press, freedom to form political parties, and open elections for the presidency and for members of the parliament. Today, religious freedom and religious pluralism have become accepted cultural norms in Taiwan, where diverse religions coexist and compete peacefully in an open market (Clart and Jones 2003;Kuo 2013;Laliberté 2009). Starting from very similar religious cultures, the mainland and Taiwan have arrived at very different places.…”

Producing Sacredness and Defending Secularity: Faith in the Workplace of Taiwanese Scientists

“…Instead, the reverse is usually the case: Politics constrains religion. The Taiwanese government, for instance, controlled or influenced religious practices as late as 1987 (Qu 1997), the year religions became nominally independent of the governing political system (Laliberté 2009). In the 1990s, a move from constraint to separation between state and religious institutions brought rapid religious growth, and by 2000, the number of registered religious groups in Taiwan was 10 times higher than in 1989 (Qu 1997(Qu , 2002.…”