2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The regulation of non-point source pollution and risk preferences: An experimental approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
9
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that the involvement of stakeholders can increase the public recognition of the pollution control plan, thereby improving the effectiveness of pollution control. Camacho-Cuena et al and Cason et al also studied non-point source pollution from different aspects through experimentation [12,13]. Non-point source pollution has also been studied from the technology and economic policy viewpoint in China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that the involvement of stakeholders can increase the public recognition of the pollution control plan, thereby improving the effectiveness of pollution control. Camacho-Cuena et al and Cason et al also studied non-point source pollution from different aspects through experimentation [12,13]. Non-point source pollution has also been studied from the technology and economic policy viewpoint in China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Camacho-Cuena and Requate designed experiments to examine the effect of collective penalty, immediate penalty, and tax subsidy schemes on agricultural pollution abatement for farmers with different risk preferences. e results show that if farmers are risk averse, tax subsidies can effectively alleviate the problem of excessive emission reduction [18]. Qiu et al obtained farmers' risk preference index using experimental economics and found that risk preference has different influence on farmers' adoption of conservation tillage technology under different risk perception [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See, among others,Spraggon (2002Spraggon ( , 2004,Alpizar et al (2004),Camacho and Requate (2004),Poe et al (2004),Cochard et al (2005Cochard et al ( , 2007,Vossler et al (2006),Oxoby and Spraggon (2008),Suter et al (2008Suter et al ( , 2009Suter et al ( , 2010,Reichhuber et al (2009),Spraggon and Oxoby (2010),Camacho and Requate (2012),Suter and Vossler (2014), andVossler et al (2013); see also the survey byGiordana and Willinger (2013). C 2014 Board of Trustees of the Bulletin of Economic Research and John Wiley & Sons Ltd…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%