1980
DOI: 10.2307/622023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Regulated and Periodic Markets and Rural Development in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2001 ketplace exchange, the tempo of market integration over time, and the expansion and contraction of market zones. Second, because market participation in peasant-market societies is typically uneven (Plattner 1989:188-190;Smith 1972:215;Wanmali 1981), comparing H scores in different subareas of a region may elucidate differences in market participation among urban and rural communities or between elite and nonelite populations. Third, comparisons of// scores among artifact categories (e.g., fine vs. domestic goods) may provide insights into differences in the scales and mechanisms of exchange for different classes of commodities.…”
Section: Using Heterogeneity To Identify Marketplace Exchangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2001 ketplace exchange, the tempo of market integration over time, and the expansion and contraction of market zones. Second, because market participation in peasant-market societies is typically uneven (Plattner 1989:188-190;Smith 1972:215;Wanmali 1981), comparing H scores in different subareas of a region may elucidate differences in market participation among urban and rural communities or between elite and nonelite populations. Third, comparisons of// scores among artifact categories (e.g., fine vs. domestic goods) may provide insights into differences in the scales and mechanisms of exchange for different classes of commodities.…”
Section: Using Heterogeneity To Identify Marketplace Exchangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond local manufacture, distances from other communities specializing in the production of functional types not produced (or under produced) locally require attention. The structure of marketplace exchange and market systems—including scale, periodicity, and hierarchical and horizontal integration (Blanton 1996; Bromley and Symanski 1974; Bromley et al 1975; Brookfield 1973; Hassig 1982; Hill 1966; Hodder 1965; Hodder and Ukwu 1969; Nash 1966; Skinner 1964; Smith 1974, 1976; Symanski and Webber 1974; Wanmali 1980; Webber and Symanski 1973; Wood 1975)—likewise deserve scrutiny.…”
Section: Confounding Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research by Corbridge (1982, 1986 suggests that it was the savings amassed by a number of permanent mine labourers-some skilled, most not-which prompted and 'paid for' the recent opening up of the protected land markets of Chota Nagpur. Regarding the organization of agriculture in contemporary Chota Nagpur, I can only report that in the context of a difficult dry-land farming system, commercialization and commercial attitudes are at least as evident amongst the tribal communities as in the non-tribal communities (see also Wanmali, 1981). The ideology of tribal economy and society, though accurate perhaps in the early part 33 Data from Census of India igsi, vol.…”
Section: The Jharkhand: Economic Transformation and Regional Changementioning
confidence: 99%