2016
DOI: 10.1101/061127
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The regulatableMAL32promoter inS. cerevisiae: characteristics and tools to facilitate its use

Abstract: SummaryHere we describe a set of tools to facilitate the use of maltose and the MAL32 promoter for regulated gene expression in yeast, alone or in combination with the GAL1 promoter. Using fluorescent protein reporters we find that under non-inducing conditions the MAL32 promoter exhibits a low basal level of expression, similar to the GAL1 promoter, and that both promoters can be induced independently of each other using the respective sugars, maltose and galactose. While their repression upon glucose additio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The heterologous regulator ScMAL13 , expressed from the constitutive ScPGK1 promoter, displayed the same expression in glucose- and maltose-grown cultures. Although ScMAL13 was efficiently expressed on glucose, none of the nine S. eubayanus maltose genes (the three identical SeAGT1 copies being undistinguishable) were transcriptionally induced under these conditions (Figure 6), confirming that the hierarchical regulatory role of glucose catabolite repression (45, 48) also takes place in S. eubayanus . During growth on maltose, all nine genes were significantly upregulated relative to glucose-grown cultures but large variations in expression level were observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The heterologous regulator ScMAL13 , expressed from the constitutive ScPGK1 promoter, displayed the same expression in glucose- and maltose-grown cultures. Although ScMAL13 was efficiently expressed on glucose, none of the nine S. eubayanus maltose genes (the three identical SeAGT1 copies being undistinguishable) were transcriptionally induced under these conditions (Figure 6), confirming that the hierarchical regulatory role of glucose catabolite repression (45, 48) also takes place in S. eubayanus . During growth on maltose, all nine genes were significantly upregulated relative to glucose-grown cultures but large variations in expression level were observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In S. cerevisiae transcriptional regulation of MALx2 and MALx1 genes is tightly controlled by a transcription factor encoded by MALx3 genes. Malx3 binds an activating site located in the bidirectional promoters that control expression of MALx2 and MALx1 genes (45, 46). To test whether absence of maltose consumption in Himalayan S. eubayanus strains was caused by a lack transcriptional upregulation of SeMALT and SeMALS , the S. cerevisiae ScMAL13 gene was integrated at the SeSGA1 locus in S. eubayanus CDFM21L.1, under the control of a constitutive ScPGK1 promoter and ScTEF2 terminator.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The p GAL promoter is inducible by galactose but also repressible by glucose, which together could result in a merely moderate increase in p GAL -driven expression at high (2%) glucose concentration. 24 Therefore, we also assayed the effect of TUP1 and CYC8 induction on cell adhesion in GM and YD, using strains BRF-p CUP -TUP1 and BRF-p CUP -CYC8, inducible by copper. The results ( Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Adhesion To Plastic Varies In Different S Cerevisiae Strainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many existing inducible gene expression systems show considerable variation in expression of the controlled gene, making it difficult to achieve homogenous pheno-types at the population level. 13,19,20 In S. cerevisiae and C. elegans, comparison of signals from strains with different constellations of reporter genes allows quantification of different sources of variation in protein dosage. 31,39,40 Here, we quantified overall variation in protein dosage by measuring the Coefficient of Variation (CoV) in fluorescent output from a single reporter ( Figure S2), and we developed a second measure (explained in SI) that normalized variation in dosage with respect to a key confounding variable, cell volume, to correct for its effect on protein concentration.…”
Section: Complex Autorepressing (Car) Controller Architecture Expandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 These methods suffer from a number of drawbacks, including basal expression when not induced,, 8,13,17 deleterious effects on cell growth due to sequestration of cellular components by the activation domain 18 induction of genes in addition to the controlled gene, 14 and high cell-to-cell variability in expression of the controlled genes. 13,19,20 These inducible systems rely on "activation by recruitment", 21 the activator binds a site on DNA upstream of a yeast gene and recruits general transcription factors and regulators of the Pre-Initiation Complex (PIC). These assemble downstream at the "core promoter", and recruit RNA polymerase II to induce transcription.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%